- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 66 Hour
- Reading permission
This post was edited by gork at 2014-5-5 11:01|
- brace yourself for the biggest crock o' **** you will ever read
Well let's face it, the thieved state of Amerika doesn't have any crocks of gold and even the crock was thieved artifacts acquired during the anglo empire of thievery.
Now you REALLY HAVE heard it all. In, "Opinion: 'War! What is it good for?' More than you thought", the Krappy News Network makes the asinine claim that war has brought about peace. Even Orwell meant it as a sarcastic joke. These are the same clowns who tried to peddle creationism under the war criminal Shrub and Blair administrations.
Ian Morris is Willard Professor of Classics, Professor of History and a fellow of the Archaeology Centre at Stanford University.
That tells you he is part of the gangster-supplied edukashun establishment and therefore a congenital liar.
Here's where the trail of twisted-logic BS starts: By many estimates, 10 to 20% of Stone Age humans died at other people's hands.
Well let's face it, medicine back then was far better than the snake oil from anglo/amerikan Big Pharma today. The estimates for the victims of the illegal invasion of Iraq varied by far more than 20%. Yet this shyster claims to be able to look back to the freakin' stone age and make this BS claim.
But between 1900 and 2000, roughly 10 billion lives were lived -- meaning that just 1-2% of the world's population died violently.
This is the same BS that Bloomberg often uses, where it states that gold has fallen as the war in Ukraine fomented by the Great Satan has subsided. There is no proof of causality. In other words, the low percentage (if you believe the statistic) of deaths in the "bloodiest century in history" was IN SPITE OF the war mongering of the UK and US. It was only because the population was so large that these gangsters were unable to kill any more than a small percentage of us.
Here's the next tenuous chain of twisted logic based on yet more dubious causality: What happened, it seems, is that starting about 10,000 years ago, the winners of wars began incorporating the losers into larger societies.
"So what?", you might ask (assuming that's even true). Here's the even more tenuous, BS answer: and one of the first things these governments had to do, if they wanted to stay in power, was suppress violence among their subjects.
That too is BS. Divide and rule is the antithesis of this. But assuming it isn't BS, societies large or small achieved via war or peace would still need this suppression of violence anyway.
Here's some more twisted (il) logic: If Rome could have been built without killing millions of Gauls and Greeks, or the USA without killing millions of Native Americans -- in these and countless other cases, if conflicts could have been resolved by reason instead of force, the world would have reaped the benefits without paying such costs.
So if war avoided murder (not "killing"), in other words no war, then war would be good! By now your BS alarm should have exploded.
Here's the aim of this BS: the United States -- capable of acting as a globocop, deterring other governments from using force.
Q freakin' ED! We need the Great Satan gangsters acting as self-appointed "police" to start more than one war a year (to peddle its arms and defraud its taxsuckers) in order to achieve peace, because without all these wars "something" might have happened such as everyone dumping the krappy dollar.