Author: english-learner

Why Chinese elites want to leave?   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-10-26 13:01:25 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2013-10-26 12:05
"...China  collective wealth is larger than private wealth..."

How wouldYOU know that?

The collective here owns poverty, debts, polluted resources, cemetaries.


that is one way to put it.
I've made my living, Mr. Thompson, in large part as a gambler. Some days I make twenty bets, some days I make none. There are weeks, sometimes months, in fact, when I don't make any bet at all because ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2015 Most Popular Member Medal

Post time 2013-10-26 14:18:29 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2013-10-25 20:05
"...China  collective wealth is larger than private wealth..."

How wouldYOU know that?

What an ass. China is as large as the USA and with all the natural resources and major state owned
enterprises the collective wealth of China is immeasurable and immense. Only little piss ants like yourself
couldn't see this. But first even a piss ant would have to visit China to have any hope of seeing this
and since you've never been to China you have no hope at all of learning about China.
If capitalism promotes innovation and creativity then why aren't scientists and artists the richest people in a capitalist nation?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2013-10-26 20:02:45 |Display all floors
The best answer is --the grass is always greener on the other-side.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-10-26 21:04:14 |Display all floors
robert237 Post time: 2013-10-25 20:34
You are cute as a well indoctrinated capitalist stooge. Don't try to be fair and balanced any more ...

I am not at all indoctrinated by the capitalists. I believe they should be taxed and regulated more. I am a moderate social democrat. The capitalist market and non-government ownership can be a more-efficient allocator of resources than a socialist command economy at this point of development. It is possible that in maybe 150 years, when poverty and scarcity ends due to more efficient production, greatly-decreased world population (birth control) and properly-regulated capitalism, the personal greed motivation that underpins capitalism will decrease. In such a favorable situation, the population may agree to increase the socialistic aspect of production and sharing of wealth. I reached this conclusion by remembering my family. All things were shared. We did not experience real poverty. All our needs were basically satisfied. As a result, I am not greedy for material things. I enjoy sharing my moderate wealth (net worth $ 2.5 million) with my family and friends. I am proud to do my social duty by paying taxes that are higher than average. Most of my education was financed by the state (tax-payers). In a good way, my family followed a Marxist internal economy. But it was not motivated by jealousy or rage.
What's on your mind...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2013-10-26 21:05:11 |Display all floors
robert237 Post time: 2013-10-26 14:18
What an ass. China is as large as the USA and with all the natural resources and major state owned ...

It's a pity you can't stand on the outside and read what you write.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2015 Most Popular Member Medal

Post time 2013-10-27 01:42:43 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2013-10-26 04:09
I see where your misunderstanding originates from: you think "collective" means national resources ...

It's no secret that you push for all the resources being owned and controlled by a very few obscenely
rich capitalists that already own the west.
Little stooge, think of how much more enjoyable life might be if you had even a tiny bit of self respect.
You're not going to get any crumbs from your master's table no matter how
much you brown nose and lie for them.

Mr. Mao made sure China still belongs to the Chinese people and all your propaganda can't change that.
If capitalism promotes innovation and creativity then why aren't scientists and artists the richest people in a capitalist nation?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2015 Most Popular Member Medal

Post time 2013-10-27 01:44:12 |Display all floors
Laowai2? Post time: 2013-10-26 05:05
It's a pity you can't stand on the outside and read what you write.

It's a pity you'll never know what it's like to have a mind of your own.
But you seem to be a reasonable happy indoctrinated stooge.
If capitalism promotes innovation and creativity then why aren't scientists and artists the richest people in a capitalist nation?

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.