Author: sansukong

Accelerating Sea Levels Due To CO2 Emissions Is Fantasy [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-4-28 10:49:41 |Display all floors
sansukong Post time: 2013-4-28 08:49
It sounds more like you than anyone else!

Seneca got his head in the right place.

While yours is screwed in the wrong places.....you no morals immoral rat.
I've made my living, Mr. Thompson, in large part as a gambler. Some days I make twenty bets, some days I make none. There are weeks, sometimes months, in fact, when I don't make any bet at all because ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-4-28 12:50:40 |Display all floors
sansukong Post time: 2013-4-28 08:49
It sounds more like you than anyone else!

All these negative attacks by a rat  on mainstream scientists.

It is very fortunate there is a Seneca to defend the absent mainstream scientists in this forum.

You, A no morals immoral rat......


I've made my living, Mr. Thompson, in large part as a gambler. Some days I make twenty bets, some days I make none. There are weeks, sometimes months, in fact, when I don't make any bet at all because ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-4-29 12:52:49 |Display all floors
This post was edited by sansukong at 2013-4-29 12:53

Reality Wake-Up Call: Climate "Experts" Sea Level Prediction Found To Be Wildly Wrong  



The IPCC's climate models and multiple government climate "experts" have proven time and again that they are completely unable to make reliable predictions of global climate attributes - this time, the climate reality wake-up call finds Australian government scientists to be wildly wrong regarding their "accelerating" sea level predictions                                                                                                                                                                                    
(click on image to enlarge, image source, temperature data)
                                                                                                                           

  As has now become well established, climate experts and their climate models have done an abysmal job at predicting global temperatures. This spectacular prediction failure has led to even greater failures for predictions of multiple climate attributes, including global sea levels. A new study has analyzed the sea level prediction capabilities of Australian government experts and found extreme prediction failure, which is another resounding testament to the gigantic waste of climate research billions over the last few decades.

                                                  _________________________________
                                                                                                                                                      
"In view of the data presented, we believe that we are justified to draw the following conclusions:
                                                                                                                                                                                        (1) The official Australian claim of a present sea level rise in the order of 5.4mm/year is significantly exaggerated


(2) The mean sea level rise from Australian tide gauges as well as global tide gauge networks is to be found within the
     sector of rates ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mm/year


(3) The claim of a recent acceleration in the rate of sea level rise cannot be validated by tide gauge records, either in
     Australia or globally. Rather, it seems strongly contradicted


The practical implication of our conclusions is that
     there, in fact, is no reason either to fear or to prepare for any disastrous sea level flooding in the near future."
[Nils-Axel Morner, Albert Parker 2013: Environmental Science]


                                                                                                                                                                                     Conclusions:
1. Expert climate model predictions of catastrophic accelerating sea level increases are wildly wrong                                   2. CO2-centric climate models that focus almost entirely on the impact of human trace emissions of
    greenhouse gases produce erroneous and unreliable predictions for policymakers                                                                                             3. The IPCC and large government computer climate models can't predict squat Note: Chart has 36-month average HadCRUT4 global temperature curve (#7 maroon) superimposed.Previous sea-level and failed-prediction postings. Sea-level and modern-temperature charts.


  April 28, 2013 at 05:11 AM






FIRST NATIONS ( LAKOTA PEOPLE ) Heartbreaking - (Google Search for video) "to stay true to who you are. Never allow anyone make you different or think different about what it is you are created to be ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-4-29 15:46:59 |Display all floors
sansukong Post time: 2013-4-29 12:52
Reality Wake-Up Call: Climate "Experts" Sea Level Prediction Found To Be Wildly Wrong  






What credibility your sources have since they are all rats and ball carrying rats of the Republican Party?







I've made my living, Mr. Thompson, in large part as a gambler. Some days I make twenty bets, some days I make none. There are weeks, sometimes months, in fact, when I don't make any bet at all because ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2013-4-30 10:17:48 |Display all floors
China is good to work with world in lowering global warming.  Global warming will harm all people of the world, including the beautiful chinese people.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-8-6 17:03:05 |Display all floors
This post was edited by sansukong at 2013-8-7 11:55

TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2013                                                                                                                        
Carbon Dioxide a pollutant? That's Claptrap!



(Top) Fake PhotoShopped Pollution in lying
Labor Party Advertisement (link)
(Bottom) Same Disused Power Station
surrounded by invisible CO2.Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant; it's natural and essential for life. This is a reality and  NCTCS blog recently addressed this when busting the "Ten Myths of Climate Change."


Recently, both PM Rudd and Greens Leader Milne have talked of "carbon" pollution. The US President Barack Obama also uses the term carbon pollution.
The plan that President Barack Obama announced on June 25 directs the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to establish carbon pollution standards for power plants to limit the amount of carbon pollution these plants can emit.They are all Socialist politicians with an agenda. Perhaps it is because of their lack of knowledge, that they mistakenly use "carbon" when they mean carbon dioxide.

More likely it is deliberate to intimate something somehow grimy like in the lying advertising from Australia's Labor Party depicted at right.

It is a pity when some-one from the other side scores a home goal. Professor Davidson.
Sinclair Davidson is Professor in the School of Economics, Finance and Marketing at RMIT and a Senior Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs. He has written extensively on taxation policy in Australia and is a regular contributor to public debate. (link - IPA)Recently Professor Davidson wrote: ([size=14.857142448425293px]link
I have no problem describing CO2 emissions as “pollution”. Pollution here has a definition – the unwanted by-product of some or other production process that gets abandoned into the commons.
and -
If co2 is produced but on-sold then it is not pollution. If it is dumped into the atmosphere it is pollution – whether it is good or bad doesn’t change the fact that it is ‘pollution’.

A good friend of this blog who contributes to debate under the nom-de-plume "Cohenite,"
has come in to bat for the "CO2  is not a pollutant" side with:
Nah, that’s (Claptrap). What has happened as part of the AGW lie is that the definition of what is a pollutant has changed from something which has a negative impact on humanity to anything which compromises pristine nature. The import of this subtle but profound change in meaning has missed all of the main stream media and most of academia and the political elite.
The consequence of the change is, since humans change nature to produce a civilized lifestyle which is based on cheap, plentiful energy and technology, all activity by humans can be classified as polluting and or it’s even more insidious sibling, unsustainable. Every school, hospital, road, dam, power plant [except, ironically the landscape destroying wind towers and solar 'farms'], house built by humans is a pollutant on nature. This view informs the misanthropic basis of AGW and the green ideology generally.
CO2 is not a BY-PRODUCT of some production process; it is a marker of civilization and indeed life.Discussing esoteric methodologies for taxing CO2 merely gives an imprimatur of legitimacy to the whole edifice of green ideology and AGW.


Posted by Geoff Brownat 10:39 AM






FIRST NATIONS ( LAKOTA PEOPLE ) Heartbreaking - (Google Search for video) "to stay true to who you are. Never allow anyone make you different or think different about what it is you are created to be ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-8-6 19:07:50 |Display all floors
rat......scratching the bottom  of the barrel, twisting and turning.............all for what? for what purpose? what possible good?
I've made my living, Mr. Thompson, in large part as a gambler. Some days I make twenty bets, some days I make none. There are weeks, sometimes months, in fact, when I don't make any bet at all because ...

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.