Views: 1765|Replies: 3

Economist: Korea in Chinese history: Stuck in the middle [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 4

Post time 2013-4-21 10:04:57 |Display all floors

AS REPORTERS gather in Seoul to await the latest hostile missive (or missile) from the North, Western governments have continued to press China to do more to rein in their putative ally. Like a pit bull chained in the front yard, North Korea does keep the neighbours on edge. Of course there is always the danger of what might happen if you neglect to feed the dog.

China’s involvement on the Korean peninsula in the period since the Korean war has been cited amply in recent press accounts. But Beijing’s interests there have historical roots which reach back far earlier than 1950. For more than two thousand years, successive Chinese dynasties have seen Korea as a tributary to be protected, a prize to be coveted, or as a dangerous land bridge which might convey “outer barbarians” into China. Unsurprising then that China should have a long history of mucking about in Korean politics, a history which has often brought it into conflict with that other great Eastern power, Japan. This has seldom worked out well for the Korean people. Nor has it led to much joy for China.

In 108BC the Han emperor Wudi conquered the northern part of the Korean peninsula. The Han empire proceeded to administer the area around modern Pyongyang for nearly 400 years.

Memories of such early conquests inspired later Chinese rulers. The Sui dynasty, after reunifying China in the sixth century AD, soon turned their sights on their neighbours. At the time, the Goguryeo kingdom ruled central and northern Korea and held territory extending into parts of Manchuria and Siberia. They considered themselves to be on a par with the Sui emperors. The Sui disagreed. Yet their campaign to chastise the recalcitrant Goguryeo proved disastrous. Despite having mobilised more than 1m soldiers, the Sui armies failed to make substantial gains on the battlefield. The expense of money and manpower crippled their dynasty. Within a few decades the Sui had given way to an even mightier Chinese empire: the Tang.

Like their Sui predecessors, the new rulers were obsessed with bringing Goguryeo to heel. Then, as now, Korea was divided among warring states. The Tang allied with one of Goguryeo’s Korean enemies in a protracted struggle for supremacy on the peninsula. In 668, the Tang armies with their Korean allies finally captured the Goguryeo capital of Pyongyang. Unfortunately for the Tang, they misjudged their own allies in Korea, who turned on the Chinese interlopers soon after and forced them back over the Yalu river, across the border from modern Korea.

This early history is not without controversy. Modern Chinese historians continue to rankle Korean nationalists by suggesting that the Goguryeo state was a product of ethnic groups from what is today North China. They argue that its dynastic period belongs to Chinese history. Korean scholars reject this, with some historians even arguing that the claims constitute a retroactive land grab, with contemporary implications should North Korea collapse.

Chinese scholars have their own gripes. In the past they have complained that Korean historical dramas depict Chinese as cruel and wanton invaders.

In the 13th century, the Mongol Yuan dynasty used Korea as a jumping-off point for what was supposed to be an invasion of the Japanese islands. A stout Japanese defence and a fortuitous wind storm prevented the Mongols from landing and provided fodder for the myth of the “Divine Wind”—kamikaze—that protected Japan from invaders.

A few centuries later, into the rule of the Ming dynasty, Japan enjoyed the opportunity to turn the tables. Toyotomi Hideyoshi launched a series of invasions of the Asian mainland, again using Korea as his point of attack. While Koreans suffered the worst of Hideyoshi’s aggression, his stated goal was nothing short of the complete conquest of China. At the time Korea was a tributary state of the Ming, sending missions bearing gifts in exchange for nominal protection, and so Japan’s challenge could not go unanswered. While the combined armies of the Ming and the Koreans managed to beat back the Japanese invasion, the war devastated the peninsula.

Nor did Korea fare much better against the Ming’s hated rival, the Qing empire of Manchuria. Straddling the zone between the Ming Empire and Korea, the Manchus began by pressing the Koreans to renounce their loyalty to the Ming court. In 1636, eight years before they conquered China itself, the Manchus had forced the Korean government to submit to Manchu authority. When the Manchus moved south and changed the name plates at the Forbidden City, one of the first visitors was a Korean delegation which came bearing tribute to the new lords of China.

In the 19th century, Korea’s continuing status as a tributary would lead China once again into war with Japan over the fate of the peninsula. Not long after the Meiji restoration of 1868, the Japanese started aggressively testing China’s willingness to defend her tributary satellites. In a mixture of imperial expansion and employment programme (for legions of suddenly unemployed samurai), the Japanese army sought to wrest the Ryukyu islands and Korea from China, as concessions. Alarmed, the Chinese sent an official to Seoul to act as a “resident counsellor” for the Korean king. His charge, somewhat ironically, was to preserve Korean independence in the face of Japanese ambitions.

Finally, in 1894 a rebellion at the court in Seoul provided Japan with a critical opportunity. Japanese troops seized the palace and installed a regent loyal to their own interests. The war that resulted was an outright disaster for China. The humiliating peace treaty that China signed with Japan gave “full and complete independence and autonomy” to Korea. In reality, Korea had swapped one suzerain for another. Japan would complete the process in 1912 by annexing Korea. This gave imperial Japan a foothold on the mainland for its eventual conquest of Manchuria and China, in what was to become the second world war.

The misgivings felt by Koreans watching outside forces—particularly China and Japan—intervening to solve problems on the peninsula is understandable, against the historical backdrop. As is China’s reluctance to commit itself to managing Pyongyang. Today’s deadlock is both a legacy of the cold war and the latest chapter in a long story of power shifts across East Asia.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-4-21 15:19:33 |Display all floors
The question that China needs to be concerned about is not whether the Koreans were once Chinese, but rather why the modern Koreans do not want to be Chinese even if it were true.

Even if the governments were distinct, their peoples have intermarried for so many centuries that there is a sizable overlap of their races in both Korea and Manchuria.  Their cultural similarities, their use of a common written language (official Korean is still Chinese characters) and even their pronunciations being so similar, eclipse their political differences.  

The above post was plagiarized from a blog in the Economist, and is not an original production of the poster.  The British make it their business to know everything they can learn about their conquered colonials or would-be colonials, in order that they can rewrite their history from the vantage point of ptepetrating British imperial influence.  Of course, reasons must be found as to why Korea can never be a part of China.

But Falklands, ahem, is a part of UK!!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-4-21 18:16:48 |Display all floors
Modern world order allows the South Koreans to be free from being stuck in the middle.

Time for China to free the North Koreans.
I've made my living, Mr. Thompson, in large part as a gambler. Some days I make twenty bets, some days I make none. There are weeks, sometimes months, in fact, when I don't make any bet at all because ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-4-22 05:10:38 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2013-4-22 05:12


This creates enormous tensions and uncertainties.  Were it not for the fact that the US is so strong as it can afford to laugh off such a threat of a nuclear attack, any weaker country would have taken action pre-emptively to prevent their own countryfrom being incinerated.  China can relax because the US can ignore North Korean bluster.

But after all the bluster and threats, it seems like North Korea thinks it has achieved the status of a nuclear state by default, since no one challenged it militarily to prove its capabilities.  Now it wants to offer terms to the UN instead, to achieve peace with North Korea.  It wants to dictate to South Korea about what it can and cannot say or do.

This kind of megalomaniacal thinking can lead to reckless aggression against South Korea on the assumption that the US and China will not dare to intervene.  The bully feels he is successful in intimidating everyone, and can do anything now he pleases.  It is time that North Korea agree to talks on denuclearization, or the UN must act fast to prevent its successful weaponization of nuclear technology.  This fellow is not only a bluffer.  He believes in his own bluffs.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.