Views: 13007|Replies: 54

Male sex drive 'to blame for world's conflicts'--Telegraph   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-1-24 17:41:26 |Display all floors
This post was edited by SMITHI at 2012-1-24 17:42

Male sex drive 'to blame for world's conflicts'The male sex drive is to blame for most of the world's conflicts from football hooliganism to religious disputes and even world wars, according to scientists Men are programmed to be aggressive towards anyone they view as an outsider Photo: REX FEATURES





By Nick Collins, Science Correspondent


23 Jan 2012




The "male warrior" instinct means that men are programmed to be aggressive towards anyone they view as an outsider, a study claims.

In evolutionary terms an instinct for violence against others helped early men improve their status and gain more access to mates, but in modern terms this can translate into large-scale wars.

In contrast women are naturally equipped with a "tend and befriend" attitude which means they seek to resolve conflicts peacefully in order to protect their children, researchers said.

The study, published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, is a review of evolutionary evidence for the so-called "male warrior hypothesis".

It claims that in every culture throughout history, men have been more likely than women to use violence when confronted by people they saw as outsiders.

Related Articles

The "tribal" attitude of men, ultimately aimed at boosting their chances of reproducing, is similar to the territorial behaviour of chimpanzees, it was claimed.
The study also examined evidence which suggests men have a stronger sense of group identity than women, and that they will develop closer ties with others in their group if they are in competition with rivals.
Although men's hostile responses most likely evolved to combat the threat from outsiders, they "might not be functional in modern times and are often counterproductive," experts said.
Over time this has resulted in full-scale wars between countries and empires, and also in scraps and skirmishes between rival groups of football supporters and urban gangs.
Prof Mark van Vugt, who led the study, said: "A solution to conflict, which is an all too common problem in societies today, remains elusive. One reason for this might be the difficulty we have in changing our mindset, which has evolved over thousands of years.
"Our review of the academic literature suggests that the human mind is shaped in a way that tends to perpetuate conflict with ‘outsiders’."
Prof van Vugt said the research established that conflict with other groups of men presented our ancestors with opportunities to improve their status and gain more access to territory and potential mates.
He added: "We see similar behaviour in chimpanzees. For example, the males continuously monitor the borders of their territory.
"If a female from another group comes along, she may be persuaded to emigrate to his group. When a male strays too far, however, he is likely to be brutally beaten and possibly killed."
Research by Californian scientists in 2008 showed that the evolution of aggression and bravery in men was down to competition for mates and territory.
Their study showed that our genes can have a significant impact on traits like belligerence, meaning that in the course of our history the most aggressive group was singled out by natural selection.
Hunter-gatherer communities engaged in frequent skirmishes with other, neighbouring groups, taking land, goods and women as a reward for victory.
This meant belligerence was rewarded with reproductive success, and the benefits of the trait were genetically passed down to future generations, while those lacking aggression were filtered out.
There are several historical examples linking the male sex drive and conflict, such as Mongolian warlord Genghis Khan who studies suggest has 16 million direct male descendants today as a result of his appetite for women.
Vikings also left a strong genetic fingerprint in areas like the Scottish Western Isles, the Isle of Skye and Iceland because raiding parties would take local wives as a reward for successful raids.



Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-1-24 17:50:19 |Display all floors
This post was edited by SMITHI at 2012-1-24 17:51

"Our review of the academic literature suggests that the human mind is shaped in a way that tends to perpetuate conflict with ‘outsiders’."
"We see similar behaviour in chimpanzees. For example, the males continuously monitor the borders of their territory.
"If a female from another group comes along, she may be persuaded to emigrate to his group. When a male strays too far, however, he is likely to be brutally beaten and possibly killed."
___________________________

hmmmmmmm now i know why they say we think with our dik.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-24 17:58:00 |Display all floors
SMITHI Post time: 2012-1-24 16:50
"Our review of the academic literature suggests that the human mind is shaped in a way that tends t ...

Could another possible reason be jealousy?
Another reason has been greed in the past.
It can't all just be down to hormones.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-1-24 18:05:00 |Display all floors
There are several historical examples linking the male sex drive and conflict, such as Mongolian warlord Genghis Khan who studies suggest has 16 million direct male descendants today as a result of his appetite for women.
____________________________________

No doubt big dik is very important for success.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-24 18:09:52 |Display all floors
SMITHI Post time: 2012-1-24 17:05
There are several historical examples linking the male sex drive and conflict, such as Mongolian war ...

Lucky bugger then huh!
I'd suggest it's a combination of those things I wrote....no one thing being the prime motivator. Men die in war so why would they go there to be killed and never have sex again if their prime motivator is the sexual urge? Kinda makes no sense if it's the sole reason, or even the main one.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2012-1-24 18:13:21 |Display all floors
This post was edited by scrotymcbugerba at 2012-1-24 18:13

so this study suggest humans in the future will be sociopaths and by that logic prisons are counter productive.i dont discount this theory but it is not the whole story . after a certain rung in the evolutionary ladder violence becomes counter productive ,something reserved as a last resort or in hopeless situations a first resort.but that is still a simplistic veiw i think maybe in the future genes that dont normally express in males might turn on the same with females ,i dont know what traditional roles will be but we are likely to have  more equal rights between the sexes.
every body writes on walls but me

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-1-25 02:02:45 |Display all floors
As usual trolls just don't get it at all.

I get it regularly and I’m happy and successful.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.