Author: antimatter

@@China military capibility ranked number 8th according to Korean Defence@@ [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-12-16 00:36:42 |Display all floors
Originally posted by antimatter at 2010-12-15 06:03



south korea, japan, or those non western developed countries have more realistic evaluation of china's capibilities than the western countries who over-exaggerated or playing the china threat ...


Well...  If they are such bravos of the military realm, then they shouldn't have noy fear whatsoever of China. They can in fact exploit this opportunity while we Chinese are only still number 8 on the list to neutralize us Chinese no problem. It's the smart way you know.  i dare Japan, south Korea, and I dare the Americans to do us in now.
Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-12-16 13:05:21 |Display all floors
Originally posted by youknowhat at 2010-12-15 01:18



she isnt attackin anybody in the region or go pass guam; she doesnt need no carrier, and of course nuclear missiles mmmuch cheaper than to have some carriers (just imagine the operatin cost o ...


Yes, I'm aware of these things. China doesn't need a sustained projectable military for the self stated self defence role.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-12-16 13:09:25 |Display all floors
Originally posted by edisonone at 2010-12-15 09:27


Through the deep wearies that the world's once upon a time and only numero uno keep having about us Chinese and/or about our transparency . Therefore, rather th ...


Ahh, gotcha and thanks. You meant that China ranks 1st equal because of her nuclear deterrent capablity, alongwith Russia and the US. I think that The UK and France can be included in that group as well. Only the US, at present can rank at number 1 though because of the US capabilities in all aspects of war, including space as well as pure projection capabilities and abilities to fight on multi fronted strategic battlefields.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-12-16 13:11:31 |Display all floors
Originally posted by edisonone at 2010-12-15 12:22





:

Spin spin spin spin
spin spin spin spin Spin spin spin spin
spin spin spin spin!!!



If they are so conce ...


The ability to fire off a few hundred nukes pales in comparison to other nations abilities in that area but, China ca assure significant damage which IS why nobody "get's on with it".

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-12-16 13:17:10 |Display all floors
Originally posted by exportedkiwi at 2010-12-15 21:05


Yes, I'm aware of these things. China doesn't need a sustained projectable military for the self stated self defence role.


the best offense makes for the best defense, ever heard?
Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-12-16 13:19:25 |Display all floors
Originally posted by edisonone at 2010-12-16 13:17


the best offense makes for the best defense, ever heard?


Of course I have but with Chinas so oft stated "no first use" policy, this defence goes right out the window, unless China's lying of course.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-12-16 13:50:05 |Display all floors
Originally posted by exportedkiwi at 2010-12-15 21:09


Ahh, gotcha and thanks. You meant that China ranks 1st equal because of her nuclear deterrent capablity, alongwith Russia and the US. I think that The UK and France can be included in that grou ...


Nah!!! It's not just the deterrent... It's the "sure-kill and deadly firepower" that China, Russia, and the US have with the DF-21D for examples as not even the scratching of the surface of it yet...

Indeed, the UK and France can throw quite a punch, but they don't have the massive geography which would enables them the leisure time to hit back with a vengeance as the former three does.

If say Russia starts to launch their Nodong's at the UK or France, if it breaches france's and the UK's defenses, which 90% chance probability Russian short and medium range missiles shouldn't have any problem, in within half of an hour, all of the UK and France would've been incinerated to cinders while Russia still have its vast Far East and Siberia expanses to ensure a deadly retaliation.

Like Russia, America's and China's vast expanses coupled with its vast arsenal of sure-kill weaponry's will enable it the sufficient time to form and execute a deadly sure-kill retaliatory response.  For that reason, you won't see a nuke exchange between any of the three - NEVER!
Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.