Author: cindy1225

Will China have the capability to challenge US Air Force in 2020? [Copy link] 中文

Post time 2010-11-13 10:29:08 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-11-14 10:37:27 |Display all floors
Originally posted by cindy1225 at 2010-11-11 00:27
According to an article from US Defense News,  by 2020, Chinese Air force will project air power outside "the first chain" and will begin to challenge US air advantage in this region.

...


Supposedly, the following is an American account of what 2020 looks like.


美国:中国2020年前将建成世界上最强大空军
[Size=-4](Total 2 pages. Click page # bottom of page for full story)

Flash: http://www.junshijia.com/article/201009/45118.html


  美称中国2020年前将建成世界上最强大空军 现役战机1/3为四代机

  据美国空军力量杂志8月刊文章称,目前解放军空军已从一支技术落后的军队成长为装备精良、训练有素的部队。到2020年的时候,解放军空军将成为一世界顶级空军部队之一。解放军目前装备的战机中,四代机所占比例达到三分之一。

  到2020年中国空军将成为世界顶级空军部队之一

  美国参谋长联席会议主席麦克穆伦上将最近呼吁关注中国对先进“远征、海事和空中能力”的“大量投资”。他指出,这“明显与北京声明的领土防御目标不一致。”穆伦表认为中国有着更大的目标。6月19日,其对亚洲协会表示,中国言行之间的“差距”很大,致使其他从对中国军事建设目的感到“十分好奇转为深切担忧。”

  对此,文章表示,穆伦的言论很不寻常,他很少公开提到中国实力增长的威胁。事实上,在中国加紧军力建设时,华盛顿的反应仍有些不冷不热,这主要是因为第二个且更重要的“中国差距”的存在。

  在这一点上,米切尔空军研究所负责人丽贝卡格兰特解释称,这种差距就是“中国在自身巧妙战略指导下稳步追求军事能力和美国国防战略之间的差距,这种差距显然降低并最大限度减少了美国对太平洋地区常规威慑力的需求。”

  文章称,格兰特在这里指的是美国国防部长盖茨对美军军事能力的重新定位,将军事能力从对中国常规力量的威慑转移至在伊拉克和阿富汗的低科技、非常规战争。值得注意的是,盖茨似乎认为美国空海两军仍在太平洋地区占据优势地区。

  最近国会批准的美中经济和安全审查委员会激烈讨论了这一观点。美国专家特别指出,中国的空军已从能力有限的区域性力军转变成一支日渐危及美国利益的力量。

  而且,美国俄亥俄州赖特-帕特森空军基地国家空天情报中心中国事务负责人韦恩阿尔曼也认为,解放军空军的实力在过去十年内已有大幅度提高。他表示,解放军空军已从一支技术落后的军队成长为装备精良、训练有素的部队。他还补充称,按照目前的路线,“到2020年,中国空军将成为世界顶级空军部队之一。”

  中国空军约1600架战机中,近500架属于第四代战机。他指出,这些战机在技术上可与美国的F-15和F-16等战机相媲美。如果阿尔曼所言属实,那么到2018年的时候,中国将拥有可与美国空军F-22“猛禽”战机相抗衡的第五代隐形战机,比盖茨自己估计的时间要早若干年。


Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-11-15 12:53:09 |Display all floors

Reply #7 kongque's post

Wow!

The A$ now is above the US$!
and even in Malaya, our M$ is strengthening!

Hope I will see again M$2.50 to US$1!

Take care, friends!
You guys are expert in the nutty world of global politics!

cheerios!

Green DRagon
Game Master

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-11-15 18:24:11 |Display all floors
Originally posted by magnetic1974 at 2010-11-13 10:29
Dumb A$$ Alex, the Soviet have the nuclear weapons but still got beat by the Mujahaadeen. US is reapeating the Russian mistake and it will end exactly the same way.

Taliban will beat the US


That's because you don't shoot with cannons at sparrows you smartass. Using nukes against Afghans....lol. But in a global conflict between superpowers this looks different.
Patria est ubicunque bene/Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-11-16 12:43:56 |Display all floors

Reply #11 Alex2010's post

Afganistan is "testing grounds" for new weapon system!
as well as preparation to create a new heroin drug production centre!
(since the Taliban, Mujaheedin will eventually need to earn funds for their war!)

It's also a sort of "experiment site" for the US military!
Rather sick!
But they are using all those ROBOT UAV, ROBOT light vehicles in Afganistan and all terrain light weight weapon systems!

cheerios!

Green DRagon
Game Master

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-11-16 13:18:16 |Display all floors
Originally posted by magnetic1974 at 2010-11-13 10:29
Dumb A$$ Alex, the Soviet have the nuclear weapons but still got beat by the Mujahaadeen. US is reapeating the Russian mistake and it will end exactly the same way.

Taliban will beat the US


I think that the different war scenarios can't be compared really. The SU vs the Mujaheddin and NATO (not solely the US) vs taliban aren't total war scenarios which occur against nations, not guerilla fighters.
Alex is therefore correct in his assertion that no nation that possesses nukes can be beaten in such a total war situation. Nobody will win a nuke war, nobody but, it'll be the civilians and grunts on the ground who lose the most, not the leadership of nuke armed nations. Something to think about there huh?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-11-16 13:20:39 |Display all floors
Originally posted by kongque at 2010-11-12 19:23



What it all boils down to is "who attacks and who defends".

The zionist USA has invested mega billions of dollars in amassing their super high tech military machine - a military  ...


And the US doesn't, or won't have an ace up it's sleeve? It's kinda ludicrous to think they don't, or won't!

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.