Views: 3458|Replies: 1

Journalists must face new exam [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 4

Post time 2010-3-11 13:52:44 |Display all floors
i don't know what are the relations among vulgarity, bad taste, unethical reporting and history of Chinese Communist Party journalism and the Marxist view of news.  Reporters all over the world should follow media ethnics principles, no matter whether s/he lives in a socialist country or a capitalist country.

south china morning post

The mainland's top print media censor is to introduce a new qualification exam for aspiring journalists this year in a push to tighten up on control of media outlets.

Li Dongdong , deputy director at the General Administration of Press and Publication, said yesterday that the new regime would be similar to the qualification exam for civil service jobs, and prospective journalists would have to sit the exam before they could apply for a news-related job.

"No matter what your field of study, if you are not taught about the history of Chinese Communist Party journalism, the Marxist view of news and media ethics, you cannot pass the tests," she added. The new qualification regime will make knowledge of Communist Party lines on news reporting and Marxist thoughts on journalism prerequisites for a qualified reporter.

Official statistics show that there are 1,943 newspapers and 9,860 magazines on the mainland that employ a million people, 230,000 of whom are editors and frontline reporters who need to obtain accreditation.

Li said the new accreditation regime was being introduced in the wake of heightened public discontent over what she called vulgarity, bad taste and unethical news reporting by mainland media. Beijing TV reporter Zi Beijia was sentenced to a year in jail in 2007 for putting together a hoax investigative report about cardboard-stuffed steamed buns being sold in Beijing.

Beijing TV quickly claimed that Zi was not an accredited reporter, to distance itself from the scandal. However the hoax, along with other irregularities, has triggered a national outcry over the lack of ethics of mainland journalists.

Farmer's Daily reporter Li Junqi was sentenced to 16 years in prison late last year after he was found to have accepted 200,000 yuan (HK$227,000) on behalf of the paper for promising to help cover up a mining accident in August 2008.

Hong Kong Baptist University journalism professor Huang Yu said the qualification exams had much more to do with official concerns over dissent than the government's desire to eradicate unprofessionalism and misconduct.

Huang said a case in point was the government's speed in meting out punishment for some senior newspaper editors who published a joint editorial calling for reform of the controversial hukou household-registration system.

Li Dongdong said all newspaper directors and chief editors would have to undergo separate training, and her agency planned to train all of them within three or four years.

Without directly referring to the saga surrounding the joint editorial, she said that senior newspaper and magazine editors should have the necessary judgment to tell what was right or wrong.

"If they don't have the judgment, that means they have yet to develop the basic political acumen to take charge," Li said. "So we should strengthen education, strengthen political education and education about control of the overall situation." The Communist Party has tightened media control, especially control over the internet, over the past year.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2010-3-11 14:08:16 |Display all floors

Editor punished

this is the result of lacking history of Chinese Communist Party journalism and the Marxist view of news education...

south china morning post

A newspaper editor says he has been punished for co-writing a bold editorial demanding the reform of the unpopular hukou household-registration system, which critics say discriminates against farmers and other rural poor.
Zhang Hong, a former deputy editor with The Economic Observer, said in a letter posted on The Wall Street Journal's website that he was "punished accordingly" for the March 1 editorial carried by 13 mainland newspapers.

"Other colleagues and media partners also felt repercussions," Zhang wrote in the letter, dated Tuesday. He did not say if he was sacked but added that he was now an "independent commentator".

Such direct and public criticism of government policy by the media is unusual.

While many publications have sharpened their reporting on controversial issues to help draw readers, editorials tend to adhere closely to Communist Party lines.

The editorial was particularly daring because it appeared just before the annual legislative session.

In his letter, Zhang said the timing was deliberate and meant "to express the media's wish to participate in China's overall reform".

He wrote: "To put it bluntly, I've lived for 36 years, but never known which representatives were chosen by me, who are able to seek justice on my behalf. We hope that the voices of the masses can make themselves heard among the representatives who `represent public opinion'."

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.