Author: 1337assassin

Darwin vs Scientology [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2007-7-22 18:34:59 |Display all floors
"the rest of the world doesnt believe in Darwinism.. just faggots and those exposed to BBC programming"

And those exposed to a Chinese middle-school education, i.e. about a quarter of humanity, of course.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2007-7-22 18:59:21 |Display all floors
Originally posted by thepeop at 2007-7-22 18:34
"the rest of the world doesnt believe in Darwinism.. just faggots and those exposed to BBC programming"

And those exposed to a Chinese middle-school education, i.e. about a quarter of  ...


british influence.. and faggots.. like I said

no one

the rest of the world doesnt..

really
-1337

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2007-7-22 19:05:35 |Display all floors
Originally posted by alexangel at 2007-7-22 11:34
Don't u think religion could conflict with Scientology...
my understanding, Darwin't evolution is scientifical.


Careful, Alex.

Don't confuse Scientology with Science based explanations, because the names are similar it may be easy to confuse, and I guess that's why "Scientology" is thus named, to try to give it more credibility than it deserves.

Scientology is a crackpot "religion" founded by a cheap science fiction author as a joke, and is used by his successors to make lots and lots of money.
There is nothing in common between real SCIENCE and "SCIENTOLOGY".

Darwin's theory of evolution is SCIENCE, whereas Scientology may well claim humans came from spacemen or something equally silly.

Of course there is scientific proof that Humans and Chimpanzees (for example) share something like 98% of our DNA.

While Humans did not evolve from Chimps, Chimps and Humans did evolve from a common ancestor.

Arseassin is another crackpot, and he may well have evolved from monkees far more recently than the rest of us.

JB
"他不是救星, 他是一个非常淘气男孩" - Monty Python

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2007-7-22 19:17:34 |Display all floors
Originally posted by emucentral at 2007-7-22 19:05


Careful, Alex.

Don't confuse Scientology with Science based explanations, because the names are similar it may be easy to confuse, and I guess that's why "Scientology" is thus name ...


I think scientology is as funny as evolution

I simply asked which farse was more believable

Darwin was a crackpot

so was the Scientology guy

humans did not evolve from a Primate ancestor, if you call him Xman, and chimanzees and modern primates are Yman, and modern humans are Zman you will see that for Darwins theory to be true.. men would have to hav lived on the planet for HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of years.. if not BILLIONS

i dont think you understand what that means

when all civilations known to man have only existed for about 6000 years

do you know what 6000 looks like to 100,000,000?

first take our ACTUAL  6000 years (that is all we know of the ENTIRE history of Human Beings)

as such:

6000

and add to that the following eras of equal time period...

as such:

6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on
and so on

until there are 16,000 seperate 6,000 year periods

and theres nothing of any of the other more than 16,000 equal 6,000 year time periods?

whats that??

evolution??

*BUUUULLSSHHYYYTTT*

[ Last edited by 1337assassin at 2007-7-22 07:58 PM ]
-1337

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2007-7-22 19:27:04 |Display all floors
Originally posted by paradoxical at 2007-7-22 15:12
Umm, I point to assasines last post above to prove my point for me, total nutter.


you forgot to add the


*snap*

[ Last edited by 1337assassin at 2007-7-22 07:44 PM ]
-1337

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2007-7-22 20:16:55 |Display all floors
Oh, please.

Common people usually think that a "theory" is something that has yet to be proven. In scentific language, however, it actually denotes a proven set of ideas that rest on a fairly solid ground and that can predict new outcomes.

Thus the theory of relativity is not a "theory" in the sense "I have a theory", but a systematic framework for determining the intrinsic properties of space-time. It is a theory that predicts results with an insane precision.

Darwinian theory of evolution also rests on a fairly solid ground, and it has helped predict features in species that should exist (and that have later been found). Since the 1950s, when the DNA molecule was discovered, the theory has been radically strenghtened, and we can now describe evolution on a very small scale using genetics. It is valid beyond any (scientific) doubt whatsoever.

Natural selection, genetics, and so on are not a matter of belief. It is a matter of fact.

Scientology, creationism, "intelligent design" and such crap, on the other hand, are all bogus religious stuff that do not stand up an inch to scientific criteria or the scientific method.

People are free to believe whatever they want, but if they "believe" that Darwinian theory is wrong, they just prove themselves stupid.
瑞典人,活着为中国娃娃而死。汉学家、工程师、摄影师、网页设计师等等。爱好:政治、历史、科技、文化等。王菲迷。自由主义者。

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2007-7-22 20:24:29 |Display all floors
I would never say Darwin was an idiot, but i would say he did the best he could and fell short.  In my opinion,  none of his conjecture can be discounted because we see it in front of us, but these things only hold true once existence has been established.   just my thoughts on it.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.