Author: 1337assassin

Darwin vs Scientology [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2007-10-23 12:03:47 |Display all floors
The theory of evolution is based on science, while scientology is the creation of a science fiction writer (who didn't like paying taxes).

Scientology is little more than a cult, though with as much money as it collects from its members... one might even go as far as calling it a scam.
------
Scientology:
"Xenu, the overlord of the universe, collects all the sentient alien species and sends them to earth. He deposits them in a volcano which he then bombs with nukes. As their souls rise, he collects them in giant "soul collectors" and brain washes them. They are then sent to wander the world and plague mankind."............ It isn't even good science fiction, but I guess it is good enough for a religion :p.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2007-10-23 15:39:51 |Display all floors
Originally posted by emucentral at 2007-10-9 06:07


Yep, and the collective intelligence of CD BBS has doubled, since !


He just popped up................looks like with Quadruple in no time.........
What's on your mind now........ooooooooooooooo la la....Kind Regards

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2007-11-13 18:25:19 |Display all floors
Sample Textdarwin totally forgot  the unstability of the sun-system.
movie_oumeiyingshi04.jpg
好心情就像好天气,给自己明媚,使他人温暖。

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2007-12-31 14:14:51 |Display all floors
there are no a thoery which can refulte another one absolutely so far.
so who can say which theory is more accurate?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2008-1-6 00:44:36 |Display all floors
Originally posted by liuxc555 at 2007-12-31 01:14
there are no a thoery which can refulte another one absolutely so far.
so who can say which theory is more accurate?

You must remember that a theory in science is different from a simple theory an individual might hold. A theory in science might have mounds of evidence supporting it with nearly everyone that investigates it recognizing it as truth. Many things we widely accept as fact are still reffered to as theorems; Theory of Relativity, many nuclear theorems, etc.

In our day and age, science has moved away from defining any concept as law. This is due to a better understanding of the macro vs. the micro, in which entirely different reactions (concerning physics) were observed. With the addition of black holes in our life time, even within the macro the laws apply differently.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2008-1-6 01:21:50 |Display all floors
You guys are kidding, right?

Scientology is one of the sickest cults of all the popular cults. Damn! It's even worse than the catholic or islamic cults and that's going some!

At least Darwinism is...well, also sort of a cult but at least based on some intellectual analysis even if he was slightly warped from spending too much time on a boat with a bunch of other guys.

But to even try and compare what is an intellectually and quite linear - even though flawed - attempt at science with a very sick and warped cult that is only baby steps away from the same cult mentality that spawned the moron Jim Jones, is ludicrous!

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.