- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 3186 Hour
- Reading permission
Reply #19 tongluren's post
The fallacy on the PRO-CONTROL people!|
Instead of "Floating on the fast flowing river" as advised by our great SOLDIER, Mr. Mao...
Mr. Tong insist on WESTERN style control and tyranny!
Try this little experiment, Mr. Tong....
Take a gal friend to a dinner somewhere you are familiar and nice in Beijing...
Buy her a meal, which has something not so tasty on it....
Bet you find that, she'll pass that bit to your plate...
ha ha ha
and Governments are like that....
If you allow Governments to be TOO LARGE...
a CLIQUE will form, a CORRUPT CLIQUE.........
and they will start passing the BAD PIECE on that plate to you....
In Malaya...the RIAU GOVERNMENT has been trying hard to AVOID that practise..
but in actual effect, the corner 50% of the central bank controlled banks, 80% of the automotive manufacture business, 60% of the government funded education business, 95% of the petroleum industry......
and gave away the worse to the Chinese, Indian, Natives, and Patani people.
In Singapore, the Government took 60% of the economy, paid its people of the Hai San gang the highest civil servant salaries in the world!!!!! and left the people only to TAP for work and taxes. The Singapore government does not work, the STRONG ARM you to pay 2 to 3x the average cost of utilities, monopolized the real estate business, take away all your savings in compulsory CPF savings, prevents you from spending so that they corner the FOREX $ that you work hard to get and give you the "free" local units.
Is that what Mr. Mao wanted??????
I doubt it......
If you look at the "manipulation" of Mr. Mao....
he created "autonomous" districts, so that people of all colour have "local decision making"....yes Mr. Mao is the RAINBOW EMPEROR!!!!!
he created "self sufficient" military units -so that the "people's armed forces" does not feed on the sweat of the people...but a unit dedicated to protect the intergrity of the Chinese nation.
he wanted to create a simple language to "GAP" between the uneducated rural poor and the wealthy city rich. But i guess, if he did it "our way"...he would build more cities and make the farmer rich by more land/production which would keep the supply of assembly labour salaries high...!!!!
which would make city folks richer!