- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 6035 Hour
- Reading permission
Originally posted by tongluren at 2006-6-23 18:50
Hell, if Australia and Canada are supposed to be example, it is easy to understand. The colonizers basically exterminated all the natives, and seeded the occupied lands with their own kind. So why is it surprising that there is "good relations'?
British Raj was beneficial: PM
July 09, 2005 18:15 IST
Last Updated: July 09, 2005 19:47 IST
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Friday acknowledged the "beneficial consequences" of British colonial rule like "free press, constitutional government, professional service, modern universities and research laboratories".
Speaking at Oxford after receiving a honorary degree of Doctor of Civil Law, Dr Singh said, "Today, with the balance and perspective offered by the passage of time and the benefit of hindsight, it is possible for an Indian prime minister to assert that India's experience with Britain had its beneficial consequences too."
He added: "Our notions of the rule of law, of a constitutional government, of a free press, of a professional civil service, of modern universities and research laboratories have all been fashioned in the crucible where an age-old civilisation met the dominant Empire of the day."
Dr. Singh said India's struggle for independence was more an assertion by Indians of their "natural right to self-governance" than an outright rejection of the "British claim to good governance."
Both India and Britain had "learnt" from each other and had much to teach the world. "This is perhaps the most enduring aspect of the Indo-British encounter," Dr. Singh added.
Originally posted by dukuanhanson at 2006-6-23 19:04
I'm curious how to be paid that blood debt? punished by God?
Nope, they'll be furiously thrashed with a bit of wet lettuce, by Tong.
[ Last edited by emucentral at 2006-6-23 07:28 PM ]