- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 1108 Hour
- Reading permission
同路人, you are so silly. China is merely repeating what has been done in the past, learning from experience (as one should). I give you a few quotes from WIkipedia:|
Since the East Asian Tigers were relatively poor during the 1960s, these nations had an abundance of cheap labor. Coupled with educational reform, they were able to leverage this combination into a cheap, yet productive workforce. The East Asian Tigers committed to egalitarianism in the form of land reform, to promote property rights and to ensure that agricultural workers would not become disgruntled. Also, policies of agricultural subsidies and tariffs on agricultural products were implemented as well.
The common characteristics of the East Asian Tigers are:
Focused on exports to richer industrialized nations
Trade surplus with aforementioned countries
Sustained rate of double-digit growth for decades
Non-democratic and relatively authoritarian political systems during the early years
High tariffs on imports (except Hong Kong which has no tariffs on most goods)
High level of U.S. treasury bond holdings
High savings rate
A high degree of what is referred to as economic freedom. Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea are 1st, 2nd, 37th, and 45th respectively on the Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom.
This all applies to China as well, althought he economic freedom is somewhat lower.
And to refer to a similer topic in another debate, let's quote this:
Since the late 1990s, some of the heat has dissipated from this debate, in part because its become of more historical than current interest: as a result of the Deng Xiaoping reforms, the PRC has one of the world's highest rates of per capita GDP growth. Furthermore, the Communist Party of China and Kuomintang today both view Taiwan independence as a common adversary and are much less likely to assert superiority over the other. Ironically, and to the chagrin of many western observers, it is now common for the Communist Party of China to use the experience of the Asian Tigers as justification for its authoritarian rule. The argument by the Party is that at the current stage of economic development the PRC needs a non-democratic system similar to those that the Tigers had in the early years of growth.
These are things we agree on, right?
Then we can conclude that the growth of China is natural, given that the government is doing the right thing. But the government is not a supernatural or superior being that has surpassed what everyone has done before in history. To think so is arrogance.