- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 58 Hour
- Reading permission
cocogito aka cogito’s miserable slave
+ Send message
+ Posts: 104
Aunticoco, you need to calm down.
Coco, I did appreciate your insidious way to attack the IQ conclusion by arguing that the IQ methodology was questionable and the correlation between IQ and Gross National Product was iffy. Yeah, you are intelligent. You proved yourself more INTELIGENT, oops, it’s INTELLIGENT, than other slaves of cogito who barely use their brains.
Obviously, your master cogito has answered the latter one of your argument clearly. And I see the former one of your arguments pretty funny.
You question the reliability of IQ methodology. Unfortunately the IQ methodology you questioned is the prevailing methodology widely accepted and used up to date. It would be highly appreciated if you could offer a new Intelligence Measure with higher credibility. Could you? I imagine you could NOT thanks to your current Intelligence level. If you could not provide a more credible way, I suggest you respect the current the one and Charles Murray’s Bell Curve. Long before Ferdinand Magellan completed the first circumnavigation of the globe, some scientist had argued that the earth is round rather than flat. Yet, please be noticed that the theory was not easily accepted as in its early stage as in modern times. In fact, it was until the Ferdinand Magellan’s personal experience served as a profound proof had the truth been widely accepted! Your attitude to question the IQ methodology with no justification is indeed questionable. Your pseudoscience could be very harmful if you apply it into daily life. Take cancer as an example. Cancer has been incurable up to present. Many physic scientists are still researching and finding a right way to get cancer cured. Apparently, current methodologies to combat cancer are questionable. Suppose you are cancered, would you refuse to take or receive treatments because you think they are QUESTIONABLE AND THUS STUPID?! I doubt you would dare to.
That you over reacted to cogito’s post on Charles Murray's "The Bell Curve", which is merely an informative fact, is ridiculous! Maybe coco is showing off his newly learnt knowledge on statistics? Or maybe he is so hysteric that he could not accept the fact that the IQ of the race he belongs to is statistically lower than that of Chinese. Who is the de facto racist and nationalist then?!
Btw, nobody denies EQ here. And nobody says that IQ is a necessary and sufficient condition to Gross Domestic Product. Does anybody attempt to imply that some countries and nations are superior to the others? Don’t get mixed up! Don’t mislead forumists here. I see you way too supersensitive over the issue.
BTW, congrats to Chinesepolice! Apparently someone's ruffled again.
It’s funny to see cocogito aka cogito’s miserable slave rush in here showing off his pseudoscience again! Apparently, Cogito’s post once again ruffled your feathers, making you nasty!
So what if I use China China China! I am Chinese! I love China! China was, is and shall be the greatest country on earth!
Long live the oriental dragon!
Long live China!
China China China China
Is this making you hysteric again, coco?!