Views: 120310|Replies: 760

A nation bickering about smoking while Iraq burns [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2004-11-26 16:40:27 |Display all floors
This thread is dedicated to the defenseless Iraqi People, and to remember the more than 125,000 Iraqi civilians (more than 50% of them were women and children) who died of this Illegal barbaric war. This thread belongs to many foumites who stood up against the war.

(The above is a note added on the day the Iraq war entered into its fourth year, the below is the original article I posted when this thread was openned.)

People from the world often wonder if Americans are capable of caring about anyone's lives but their own. I know this is unfair for those 49% Americans who voted against Bush, but from my debating with some of the self-claimed Americans on "US marine kills wounded Iraqis" thread, they do send out that chilling message. And we can get a sense from this article too.

Its idolisation of 'the face of Falluja' shows how numb the US is to everyone's pain but its own

Naomi Klein

Iconic images inspire love and hate, and so it is with the photograph of James Blake Miller, the 20-year-old marine from Appalachia, who has been christened "the face of Falluja" by pro-war pundits, and the "the Marlboro man" by pretty much everyone else. Reprinted in more than a hundred newspapers, the Los Angeles Times photograph shows Miller "after more than 12 hours of nearly non-stop, deadly combat" in Falluja, his face coated in war paint, a bloody scratch on his nose, and a freshly lit cigarette hanging from his lips.

Gazing lovingly at Miller, the CBS News anchor Dan Rather informed his viewers: "For me, this one's personal. This is a warrior with his eyes on the far horizon, scanning for danger. See it. Study it. Absorb it. Think about it. Then take a deep breath of pride. And if your eyes don't dampen, you're a better man or woman than I."

A few days later, the LA Times declared that its photo had "moved into the realm of the iconic". In truth, the image just feels iconic because it is so laughably derivative: it's a straight-up rip-off of the most powerful icon in American advertising (the Marlboro man), which in turn imitated the brightest star ever created by Hollywood - John Wayne - who was himself channelling America's most powerful founding myth, the cowboy on the rugged frontier. It's like a song you feel you've heard a thousand times before - because you have.

But never mind that. For a country that just elected a wannabe Marlboro man as its president, Miller is an icon and, as if to prove it, he has ignited his very own controversy. "Lots of children, particularly boys, play army, and like to imitate this young man. The clear message of the photo is that the way to relax after a battle is with a cigarette," wrote Daniel Maloney in a scolding letter to the Houston Chronicle. Linda Ortman made the same point to the editors of the Dallas Morning News: "Are there no photos of non-smoking soldiers?" A reader of the New York Post helpfully suggested more politically correct propaganda imagery: "Maybe showing a marine in a tank, helping another GI or drinking water would have a more positive impact on your readers."

Yes, that's right: letter writers from across the nation are united in their outrage - not that the steely-eyed, smoking soldier makes mass killing look cool, but that the laudable act of mass killing makes the grave crime of smoking look cool. Better to protect impressionable youngsters by showing soldiers taking a break from deadly combat by drinking water or, perhaps, since there is a severe potable water shortage in Iraq, Coke. (It reminds me of the joke about the Hassidic rabbi who says all sexual positions are acceptable except for one: standing up "because that could lead to dancing".)

On second thoughts, perhaps Miller does deserve to be elevated to the status of icon - not of the war in Iraq, but of the new era of supercharged American impunity. Because outside US borders, it is, of course, a different marine who has been awarded the prize as "the face of Falluja": the soldier captured on tape executing a wounded, unarmed prisoner in a mosque. Runners-up are a photograph of a two-year-old Fallujan in a hospital bed with one of his tiny legs blown off; a dead child lying in the street, clutching the headless body of an adult; and an emergency health clinic blasted to rubble.

Inside the US, these snapshots of a lawless occupation appeared only briefly, if they appeared at all. Yet Miller's icon status has endured, kept alive with human interest stories about fans sending cartons of Marlboros to Falluja, interviews with the marine's proud mother, and earnest discussions about whether smoking might reduce Miller's effectiveness as a fighting machine.

Impunity - the perception of being outside the law - has long been the hallmark of the Bush regime. What is alarming is that it appears to have deepened since the election, ushering in what can only be described as an orgy of impunity. In Iraq, US forces and their Iraqi surrogates are no longer bothering to conceal attacks on civilian targets and are openly eliminating anyone - doctors, clerics, journalists - who dares to count the bodies. At home, impunity has been made official policy with Bush's appointment of Alberto Gonzales as attorney general, the man who personally advised the president in his infamous "torture memo" that the Geneva conventions are "obsolete".

This kind of defiance cannot simply be explained by Bush's win. There has to be something in how he won, in how the election was fought, that gave this administration the distinct impression that it had been handed a get-out-of-the-Geneva-conventions free card. That's because the administration was handed precisely such a gift - by John Kerry.

In the name of electability, the Kerry team gave Bush five months on the campaign trail without ever facing serious questions about violations of international law. Fearing that he would be seen as soft on terror and disloyal to US troops, Kerry stayed scandalously silent about Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay. When it became painfully clear that fury would rain down on Falluja as soon as the polls closed, Kerry never spoke out against the plan, or against the other illegal bombings of civilian areas that took place throughout the campaign. When the Lancet published its landmark study estimating that 100,000 Iraqis had died as result of the invasion and occupation, Kerry just repeated his outrageous (and frankly racist) claim that Americans "are 90% of the casualties in Iraq".

There was a message sent by all of this silence, and the message was that these deaths don't count. By buying the highly questionable logic that Americans are incapable of caring about anyone's lives but their own, the Kerry campaign and its supporters became complicit in the dehumanisation of Iraqis, reinforcing the idea that some lives are expendable, insufficiently important to risk losing votes over. And it is this morally bankrupt logic, more than the election of any single candidate, that allows these crimes to continue unchecked.

The real-world result of all the "strategic" thinking is the worst of both worlds: it didn't get Kerry elected and it sent a clear message to the people who were elected that they will pay no political price for committing war crimes. And this is Kerry's true gift to Bush: not just the presidency, but impunity. You can see it perhaps best of all in the Marlboro man in Falluja, and the surreal debates that swirl around him. Genuine impunity breeds a kind of delusional decadence, and this is its face: a nation bickering about smoking while Iraq burns.

A photo of the soldier James Blake Miller portrait is followed. And here is the site of my debate "Report: US marine kills wounded Iraqis": ... hlight=%2Bshanhuang

[ Last edited by shanhuang at 2006-3-20 07:46 PM ]

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2004-11-26 17:06:27 |Display all floors

The smoking American "hero" in Fallujah


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2004-11-26 17:21:00 |Display all floors


1) If John Wayne is the "brightest star ever created by Hollywood" then those Jews running the show out there are in big trouble.

2) Smoking is uncool, but honestly!  It is REALLY silly to center in on that mundane item.

3) What icon should appropriately represent the Fallujah insurgents?  The guy who saws heads off on video?  Or the one who shoots an innocent woman who gave 30 years of her life to helping Iraqis?  Or maybe the one who disemboweld a woman and cut her arms off? Or maybe the one who bombed those children in the center of Bagdad?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2004-11-26 19:08:26 |Display all floors

A thought on Karenb's comment 3)

The International Red Cross has condemned those insurgents who took civilian hostages;

And The International Red Cross has also strongly condemned the US armed forces for violating Geneva Conventions.

We have known so far at least 100,000 Iraqi civilians died of this Iraq war, and waging the war in itself has violated International laws by passing UN. Kofi Annan said it is illegal.

Here through this article we would like to see and discuss inside America how it responded as a nation -- which leads to the initial question I raised at the beginning of my first post.

Another point is that all of those terrible things described in Karenb's  comment 3) didn't seem to exist before the war. (correct me if I am wrong.)

Finally, please don't take me wrong, I condemn both terrorists and civilian killings.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2004-11-26 20:34:06 |Display all floors

Karenb, Is there life after death? Do you believe in resurrection?

I never believe in resurrection!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2004-11-26 21:01:37 |Display all floors

The Honorable Karenb, i don't know 1kanyuek, 2 kanyuek or 3kanyuek or kanyuek!

Case closed!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2004-11-26 21:16:35 |Display all floors

a thought on Karenb's comment 3)

First of all newspapers are trying to sell their paper, that is not all of America. USA is not America.  We are United  States of America.  50 states (countries), united  with  one Fedural goverment
Next you stated 49% voted  against Bush, sorry, that is wrong, but a close thought of the small amount of people who voted  here. Many people that can vote, do not vote.
What you say did not happen befor the war? Killing of civilians?  As when Sadams army would go kill kurds?  Or other ethnics or trouble spots he  delt with.
Why do you think the USA had to fly  and inforce  Iracs  from being killed by Iracs  since the end of the 1992 war?  We care.

Could anyone wonder why we care?
We as a nation are looked at from other nations (their veiw) as war mongers. I think that is very sad.  Wrong too. But we all think what we will.
Many people wanted to nuke  Iran when our Embasy was over-ran, we did not, and we did not  escalate it into war either.
We did  and do many things.  Any nation that does things worldwide will be   looked at according to what people think.
Thinking of  all the things we have done I am surprized people think we  Citizens are as you seem to think. we are. We  care about others.  
I see the  face as a persons face  doing his best to stay alive!

<<Here through this article we would like to see and discuss inside America how it responded as a nation -- which leads to the initial question I raised at the beginning of my first post.

Another point is that all of those terrible things described in Karenb's comment 3) didn't seem to exist before the war. (correct me if I am wrong.)

Finally, please don't take me wrong, I condemn both terrorists and civilian killings.>>

2004-11-26 19:08 <>

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.