- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 13 Hour
- Reading permission
RottenRobbie Post time: 2019-8-16 03:36
A rich spoiled Capitalist kid who only care for himself, and the rest he couldn't car ...
" Hong Kong : A rich spoiled Capitalist kid who only care for himself, and the rest he couldn't care less.
I agree, the kid needs to be admonished, first and for all.
Besides, like I read it somewhere, Hong Kong in the past prospered a great deal because of China, since mainland China historically was blocked by the Colonialist Anglo West, and could not export their products directly to outside world under Western influence; thus Hong Kong came in and basically acted as a middle man, relabeling products from China and taking commission on it. Moreover, these Protest groups/organizations that Capitalist West helps set up in Hong Kong are nothing more than the forefronts of Tit-for-Tat protocol in place, in times of event that their capitalist imperialist interests are threatened; what they basically do is unleash those watch groups and organizations as part of their all out effort to destabilize any region that they feel threaten. Finally, typical ethnic Hong Kongers are working class people who work for these Capitalist Western interests, such as their companies and businesses. "
" I wholeheartedly agree with the fact that Hong Kong is becoming sort of like, a rich spoiled kid who only care about oneself. A rich spoiled Capitalist brat, who only care for himself, and the rest he couldn't care less.
So, here's my suggestion. Why not send those unemployed youths, rioters and protesters over to place like Australia, a gigantically huge (a thousand times larger than tiny Hong Kong, where people live like sardines) resourceful bountiful Continent in Asia-Pacific region, only a few hundred miles away from South-East Asia that had no original indigenous Native Asian-Pacific Islanders in that vast landmass, historically traditionally inhabiting when Anglo British, some 10,000 miles away from jolly ole England, sailed half way around the world, and looted in late 18th century? This doesn't make sense, since Asian-Pacific Islanders originally and historically inhabiting and residing in Pacific such as Guam, Tonga, New Zealand, Tahiti, Fiji and Hawaii?
Speaking of New Zealand, why did these same Anglo British, sailed half way around the world and looted in late 18th century? Why didn't they occupy beautiful fertile Iceland, right above them just a short distant away from England, with hardly any people there, even today?
Like I said, why did they the Anglo British loot New Zealand and Australia, a vast bountiful Continent in Asia-Pacific: why didn't they loot that beautiful fertile Iceland, just a short distant away from their jolly old England, with hardly any people there? Besides, they are exporting and selling all the resources, from that looted Continent of Asia-Pacific people, back to Asia-Pacific nations. "
Like I said, a vast bountiful landmass in Asia Pacific, now known as "Australia", that is one thousand times larger than tiny Hong Kong, where people live like sardines in a can.
Here's an Asia Pacific map below,