Author: pnp

'Shenzhen gov't to start fight against e-cigarettes', [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-2-24 12:45:45 |Display all floors
This post was edited by pnp at 2019-2-24 13:01
cmknight Post time: 2019-2-24 01:05
Then ... start your argument. Oh, and BTW, calling someone's claims "spurious" is an ad hominem at ...

We can have a conversation if you would stop regurgitating the same old arguments;  spare us from reading more of the same!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-2-24 12:54:14 |Display all floors
cmknight Post time: 2019-2-24 01:05
Then ... start your argument. Oh, and BTW, calling someone's claims "spurious" is an ad hominem at ...

"calling someone's claims "spurious" is an ad hominem attack"

No, it is not!  Are you clinging on to your claim that vaping is good for lungs, as you claim to have vaped since 2012 and your doctor said you have very good lungs?   Readers must never be misled by your claim that vaping is good for their lungs; that's my aim in rebutting your claim!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-2-24 13:44:12 |Display all floors
cmknight Post time: 2019-2-24 01:05
Then ... start your argument. Oh, and BTW, calling someone's claims "spurious" is an ad hominem at ...

Readers must never be misled by your claim that vaping is good for their lungs, lest they start puffing the poisonous fumes of e-cigarettes!  That is why I have to expose your claim as spurious because it is unscientific and misleading!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-2-24 13:48:12 |Display all floors
While Shenzhen's latest ban on e-cigarette puffing in public is to be commended, it does not go far enough.  Shenzhen should learn from Hong Kong which criminalise the manufacture and sale of e-cigarettes, hitting the problem at source!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2019-2-24 20:17:58 |Display all floors
pnp Post time: 2019-2-24 13:48
While Shenzhen's latest ban on e-cigarette puffing in public is to be commended, it does not go far  ...

yes commend commend but this is talk about china place and who will take care of it?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-2-25 00:25:38 |Display all floors
pnp Post time: 2019-2-24 12:45
We can have a conversation if you would stop regurgitating the same old arguments;  spare us from r ...

Oh, i'm sorry. I wasn't aware that use of science and links to studies that prove vaping is a safer alternative to smoking (harm reduction) was worse than rhetoric from public health experts/organizations who only have degrees in social sciences, and who lobby governments with massive campaign fund contributions.
Stupid people are like Glowsticks. You want to snap them in half and shake the crap out of them until they see the light.
I love sarcasm. It's like punching someone in the head ... only with words

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-2-25 00:28:31 |Display all floors
pnp Post time: 2019-2-24 12:54
"calling someone's claims "spurious" is an ad hominem attack"

No, it is not!  Are you clinging on ...

How about the claims and testimonials from thousands of smokers who have switched over to vaping to improve their health?
11,677 Testimonials
Stupid people are like Glowsticks. You want to snap them in half and shake the crap out of them until they see the light.
I love sarcasm. It's like punching someone in the head ... only with words

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.