Author: wchao37

Plausible Outcomes of the Coming Trade Talks   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 08:17:16 |Display all floors
美国一直用“出口伊朗”为借口, 企图消灭所有中国高科技公司,包括中兴华为。

美国和中国在高科技领域是在激烈竞争,而且竞争得你死我活的,但是用个没有证据的指控,动用政府的力量,把一位从来没有犯罪记录,有正当职业的全球知名公司的高管,当成刑事现行犯进行逮扑,司马昭之心路人皆知,就是标准的栽赃陷害污蔑。

加拿大这次选边站,在没有任何证据的情况下,帮美国逮扑孟晚舟,还借口按法律办事,实在很不要脸地破坏司法程序,用政治干涉司法。

中国政府不惜外交风险,勇敢地出面保护自己的海外公民,是一个负责任有担当的,为人民服务的好政府。如果这时候中国人还不站出来,一致声讨支援杯格加拿大的话,中国人以后在海外,就只能作外人的走狗汉奸卖国贼,才能苟且偷生了。

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 16:10:30 |Display all floors


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 16:17:14 |Display all floors
希望孟女士早日安返家門!

但如果妥協,像這種不辨是非、沒有道義、沒有信用的國家,只會變本加利!

對這種角色「以牙還牙」似乎是唯一的選擇!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 16:29:25 |Display all floors
This post was edited by wchao37 at 2019-1-23 18:24

美國,英國,加拿大,這些大國找不到任何華為的5G危害個個國家安全的证据,只因華為的5G科技超越英美加,美國就用安全因素拒用華為,

美國監控全世界,為什麼就沒有國家提出反對?

這跟本就是2套標準,在他們眼中,中國的科技不能超越他們,一但有,就極盡打壓,中國的進步與科學,是為全人類共同進步,不會因為美,英,加等國而停下腳步,我認為美,英,加等國將會跟不上世界進步而後悔莫及。

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 22:30:17 |Display all floors
wchao37 Post time: 2019-1-22 18:56
During the G20 meeting in Argentina, the Americans asked the Chinese side to include Fantanyl produc ...

Trudeau's public image suffered a major setback
maybe in china, but who cares what china thinks, they are not voters.
Anger is an acid that can do more harm to the vessel in which it is stored than to anything on which it is poured. Mark Twain

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 23:03:49 |Display all floors
1/2


It should be crystal-clear to everyone by now the Anglo-Trump's have no wish to make any deal under any circumstances of any global landscape anyone cares to paint.

Because they remain white supremacists to the core. It was never about trade and deals for that matter technology. It was all about the subjugation of another rising superpower, one which has made superhuman strides in national development until it could even afford to help the rest of the world whose many economies had suffered under the weight of a global financial crisis caused by the other superpower. Could it be because that recalcitrant superpower wants to continue causing more future global crises so that others will tamely toe its west-lit media line to look up to it for salvation just after destruction?


The ideology of the Anglo-Trumps is not about sovereign rights as an embodiment of the right of nation-states to develop their own humans. The ideology of the Anglo-Trumps is simply "i win only if you lose any which way". Their ideology is "follow me or i shall make sure you'll be cornered and left behind for good. Meanwhile, you can pay for my travelling expenses in recognition of my democratic leadership". Perhaps that's why today the US is split between "democratic" Democrats and "democratic" Republicans fighting it out over a wall to be paid by a poor neighbour.


And that's also why if any other country says 'two wrongs don't make a right', the only unified self-withering US response is to bellow 'two Wong's don't make a White'.

Now, with only five weeks to go before his own so-called deal deadline, Trump said things were going well and his Kudlow also said negotiations are still going on ....BUT neither of them has explained to the world why the US administration has peremptorily rejected two of China's Vice-Ministers from going to Washington to make preparations for this month-end meet between their Lighthizer and China Vice-Premier Liu He. Perhaps it is because of the US administration lock-down that no one could be identified who officially mentioned the rejection was because they were not given a written undertaking on the matters of 'forced technology transfers' and 'structural reforms'.

Excuse me - if China had forced technology transfers, her workers would be working on the avionics systems and not the incabin fixtures and fittings only of the Boeing planes being cosmetized on China soil which is what they are only allowed to do even after China has committed to buying hundreds of Boeing planes well into the next two decades. Maybe since Trump can set trade deadlines, China can now also reset purchase order deadlines.

And excuse me again - if by structural reforms, the US intends for China to also follow the way of the US 'democratic' leadership instanced by closing down its administration just because one wore pants and the other skirts, then shan't China ask the US to also undergo its owns structural reforms so that other countries can be clearer of what's the core US intent that is not malignant maleficience against them after filtering out the 7,000 lies spouted as truths, accepted as facts and conveyed as policies that are to be followed in deals that are not deals because a deal is never made by using threats.  Otherwise they would be called Blackmails, made by Whites, to boot!

Furthermore, China's SOEs had achieved remarkable success last year as part of the her economic reforms. The centralization of authority has focused and directed those reforms to be made just in time to thwart external threats which would have destabilized the economy upon which millions depend for their livelihood including those outside the country. Didn't those foreign powers even think for a moment if China is destabilized, what will happen to their own hundreds of multinationals which have parked their plants in the country to make for the world that in turn has shored their share prices and enabled them to amass mountains of funds to make investments in their very own innovations that they say China is competing with against them? All that ivy-league education and even their Navarro's and Pillisbury's miss it all.

And lastly, in all seriousness, no country - and that includes the US - will allow any other country to dictate terms and define what is to be reformed and by when. Similarly, what is to be purchased and how much by when. Likewise, what is to be defined and to what extent.


The US is in no place to tell China like a schoolteacher telling a pupil to write down the homework to be done. After all, the former was still killing its original land native owners by carbine annexation when the latter was already trying to save its own thousand-years civilization by fighting an Opium War started no less by the former's Anglo cousin just because the British wanted tea and silk for free AND its silver back by smuggling opium made by its East India Company, the world's first multinational. As already said, opium war of nineteen century, trade war of twentyfirst century - what's the friggin' difference?

Push has come to shove.  Yet China has been wise and still remains tactful and diplomatic in her approach, always seeing what's next which will happen if a certain action is taken and how many in the world - as is happening today - will be affected by acrimonious demands made without longer-horizon forethought for all.  The Anglo-Trumps have only been slash-and-burn-and-loot. The old Summer Palace comes to mind again. If China opens up at the Anglo's behest and to their specifications, it will be more than her ports colonized by the imperialists of yonder days which will be hijacked; how else will her peoples realize otherwise? It will be more than her opening up to their demands because it will be her own innate means and ways to contribute to world development by the brow of all-men-are-brothers-first that will be crimped.


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 23:04:17 |Display all floors
2/2

In attacking Huawei on all fronts, they have shown they are not above trying to cut China's fast-sprint legs to the stumps. If they have no malice, why try to do that? Why kidnap a financial officer originating from one country and on transit from another to a third when all three countries have nothing to do with an argument between two other countries, one of which trying to snuff the life out of the other? Ah, it's because the financial officer is working in Huawei, China's best-of-breed innovator of technology. But how can that be? If China has not said anything to diminish the US' own blueprints for its national technological competitiveness in the same areas, who gives the US any right to do so against China2025 which only embodies China's aspirations to contribute to world technological advancement? Did China ever tell the US to stop it in much the same way the US has told China to stop it failing which see what we are going to do to you?

Frankly, this is not going to end well. And it is a sign of the US' weakness in not thinking things through more thoroughly first that the world has come to this stage this late. Sorry, i am not sanguine of the final result on March 2nd. Because Trump has toxified and activated the worst in American foreign policy released from the arteries of its white supremacist distortions that have irresponsibly and irredeemably lensed China as an existential threat to the US yet without answering cogently how the US and China will need to coexist after parting ways while still living as neighbours on this small planet. If the US is trying to diminish China's prowess in technology so that it can sell more of its technologies to China's citizens, will they even deign to buy any after the decoupling? Or is the US satisfied to sell the remnants of what it makes in its new technologies only to the UK, Canada, Germany, Poland, Japan and Australia?

So... first outcome: not likely because the cancer has metatasized into the US congress. Second outcome: it depends. China can too start a drama to that started by Trump. Somewhere in the big country, one may even find a Bannon, Navarro, Bolton, Rubia, Kutlow, Lighthizer, Mnuchin, Pillsbury, et al, and that particular backroom strategist, the architect of it all. Not that China would wish for such a performance if it can help it.  But let the world see if the US is man enough to take a dose of its own medicine.  And third outcome: please...just...do if all indications from the US is that it will not reset to ground zero the original situation again - tariff and cfius (besides One-China, SCS etc). As one may also take a leaf out of American military history at Remagen, the reply to the US should it try to be funny on sovereign self-determination of other countries shall be "Nuts".

Meanwhile, China's innovators must continue to productivize for the world; the trade depression is but a small part of her GDP activities although crowbarred by the US attempts at decoupling, marginalizing and isolating which have also affected its own interests besides those of its socalled allies and the rest of the planet.

High technology may now be the new platform of contention but it is facing chip-making problems in the limits of wafer fabrication as returns form higher Moore Law compressions become increasingly marginal when measured against investments needed. Even if chip makers stretch their advanced process control mechanisms to the hilt, there will come a time what can be achieved by linear parallelism will mean extra costs and thus more heavily loaded prices.

Given the success of quantum theory in explaining physical behavior at the subatomic levels despite its exotic and esoteric interpretations, quantum computing could one day be used to design and make quantum chips that use their ghostly qubits q which on/off spin to create [2 to the power of q] values open to computation through combinations of q-spins to create the logic gates which in turn combine to create the algorithms. So let the slimeballs continue their self-delusion in their chip monopoly for 5G. Huawei and others can start a lab to look deeply into quantum chips for terrahertz 6G, a starkly new innovation space currently being probed in but a few places.

When it comes to (1) scaling up research and investments, (2) designing-for-the-mass-consumer, (3) total mass-production, (4) integrated quality control, (5) speed-to-market, (6) next-generation innovation, and (7) instant and viral mass market acceptance, China has no peers as seen in recent years. In fact, she is just warming up.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.