- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 1223 Hour
- Reading permission
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-14 14:54|
JACKIE CHAN IS VERY MUCH SANE AND SOUND IN MIND AND BODY . . . compared to traitors like Revoluted, GreenDrag, and JorFanny.
The Occupy Central movement is based on a crime, to violate public law and disrupt public order, in order to pressure China to rescind its law that all nominees for Chief Executive of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (HKSAR) must be approved by the National People's Congress.
This is the ONLY WAY to prevent foreign powers from putting their point men on the ballot for the Chief Executive of HKSAR, and is STANDARD PRACTICE IN ALL WESTERN DEMOCRACIES, except its vetting procedures are totally opaque and hidden behind closed doors, unlike in China whose DEMOCRACY WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS is honest and transparent. To be a Chief Executive of HKSAR, the candidate must be a citizen of the People's Republic of China. As such, the People's Republic of China has the RIGHT to investigate and confirm if that candidate actually fulfills the basic requirements of citizenship, i.e., accepts without reservation the sovereignty of China in Hong Kong, and has not rejected, questioned, ignored, contradicted, insulted or opposed it by words, by deed, or by attitude.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING UNDEMOCRATIC ABOUT ANY GOVERNMENT VERIFYING THE GOOD CITIZESHIP, NOT JUST IN BIRTH CERTIFICATES BUT ALSO IN BEHAVIOR, OF ANY CANDIDATE FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE POSITION.
DOES ANY BODY HAVE ANY PROOF THAT ANY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OR VICEROY OF HONG KONG WAS NOT VETTED BY THE BRITISH MONARCHY BEFORE ASSUMING THE UNDEMOCRATIC POST OF VICEROY OF HONG KONG? ON THE CONTRARY, EVERYONE OF THEM WAS APPOINTED BY THE BRITISH MONARCHY TO RULE OVER THE NON-CONSENTING HONG KONG PEOPLE, SO HOW CAN A BRITISH SYSTEM BE MORE DEMOCRATIC THAN A CHINESE SYSTEM WHERE THERE IS AT LEAST A CHOICE AMONGST CANDIDATES THAT THE HONG KONG PEOPLE CAN PICK AS TO WHO WOULD SERVE THEM BEST?