- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 0 Hour
- Reading permission
I'm happy to be instrumental for you to fully spread out your Characters on CD f
To repentless, Dobridan,|
"funny" --- What is so funny? Are you always treate other people's mental suffering indifferently after their equal Human Rights of Freedom of Speech have been voilated? By Law, your indifference is named as "Malicious".
"Thanks for the laugh Yang." ------ NO PROBLEM. NOT FOR YOU. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE 1.3 BILLION PEOPLE'S EQUAL HUMAN RIGHTS ON THEIR OWN SOIL NOT BE INTIMIDATED BY CRIMINAL CONDUCTS ON CHINA DAILY. I remind you that your behavior of attacking the Chinese readers by throwing out the irrelevant words "funny, laugh" , which is one of the techniques you applied on other readers for the purpose of silencing their Human Rights of Freedom of Speech of Truth proved your shallowness, igorance, aggression and evil. You would otherwise be able to provide the substance.
"Mr lawyer," ----- Are you sure that you are the one who is authorized to grant me the Practicing Certificate or unlawful acting is your habitual way? Confirm it. Save your techniques for your self-service.
Whether you are a lawyer or not, democracy means the law binds everybody, and everybody has the equal responsbility to the compliance to the Law. Are you telling me you are above the Law, and authorized to do anything on Chinese people without binding effect of law?
"have you noticed that rule 6. does not does not particularly identify rule 5. as the rule it is relating too?
Rule 6 talks about this rule. It does not mention rule 5.
You have made an assumption that this rule is rule 5, whereas it is inconclusive." -----
1. By Interpretation Act: word should be read in context. The word used in the later part of the document has the same meaning as it appears at the first unless otherwise specified. Single refers to plural in legislation.
2. The fact that the Equal Human Rights of Freedom of Speech of Chairman and Wchao37 on CD have been violated and hence their Voice of Truth have been silenced by Hedan and others, which I'll have further inspection and provide the evidence later to include all of you who have been involved in this conspiracy of violating Human Rights of Freedom of Speech to serve the purposes of forcing your lie on others, in this application.
3. Now that you, Dobridan volunteered to provide misleading information and conducting further intimidation assaulting me, evidenced by both of your false accusation without evidence provided. I give you a further chance to prove which part of my post was untrue, calculated to a degree of assaulting Hedan. Alternatively, we all provide credible evidence of our IDs to the International Police so that we can have the matter properly resolved in the International Criminal Court, if YOU HAVE EVER HAD THE BALLS.
4. Hedan bears the evidential burden to prove which provision of the rule he/she has referred to to, and the evidence as the ground for him/her to have had the equal Human Rights of Freedom of Speech of Chairman and Wchao37 violated.
5. If China Daily does not remove Hedan as per my application after I have provided the evidence to prove the fact beyond doubt, China Daily needs to provide the justified explanation why Chairman and Wchao37 have ever been silenced, which is the fact.
6. If you are coercing China Daily and belived that you have this UNEQUAL HUMAN RIGHTS CONFERRED to exercise this your power of forcing China Daily to corruptly apply doubt standard on THE EQUAL READERS between Chairman, Wchao37 and Hedan, then you are telling me and all the Chinese that you are entitled to violate the Chinese Equal Human Rights. You therefore not only need to shut up relating to matters of Chinese Human Rights, Application of Law, Corruption, Justice by the Chinese government, because it is what you, Hedan, and others have been forcing Chinese government to have the Chinese HUMAN RIGHTS SO VIOLATED .
7. In the case that China Daily does not to have Hedan removed from Forum, then the evidence is established that China Daily English forum is for some nasty people knowingly to defame, accuse, humiliate China and Chinese, not for serving the purpose of Freedom of Speech conferred by Human Rights. Then the Heading of my article is proven. The Chinese Readers and Readers worldwide then have the rights to be truthfully informed by China Daily of the effect and purpose that China Daily actually served.
8. Evidence to prove the words to the effect of "Chinese female Mainlander overseas are prostitutes" needs to be proven, don't you think? Otherwise, people would suspect that writers' grandfather, Hedan's grandfather, seneca's grandfather might have been fucked by the overseas prostitutes of Mainlander Chinese, and so gave birth to your fathers, because they are all overseas, right? By Law this is the right Forensic judgement on proving the first to establish the second. you violated my Human Rights for not allowing you to represent me. Yeah, Yeah, Yeah admire you?.. for what, if you have never had the right thing under your pants that can satisfy my selecting criteria?
9. The overriding principle of Law in 揾ighly democratic countries?is JUST and EQUITBLE. Don't you know this? If you are trying to apply the case identical to that brit pregnant bitch soldier carrying the baby around sexually abused the Iraqi POWs without respect to the International Law, then Claiming her human rights for the purpose if escaping from the punishment by the International Law, it would not be Just and Equitable, don't you think. Whether that brit carried the Iraqi POWs?babies, and how many, I don't know.
揟his could take years in the courtroom to work out.?------- You mean it is your experience that court normally can not draw appropriate conclusion within reasonable time of life span in your highly democratic countries? I agree with you. No wonder the evidence law proved that the process and procedures of the court, which exist to administer justice with fairness and impartiality, may be converted into instruments of injustice or unfairness. I have the first hand experience to agree with you. This is the lesson that China really needs to learn to prevent the injustice from happening in China.
揂ll said and done, you are now harassing HeDan.?---- Now, I am telling you that I抦 wounded and sick and will inform you until It not. Then you need to provide evidence to prove what are you by saying that this that tortured me by false accusation after I have been assaulted by his posts threatening removal of any reader if he/she is 損iss? ed off.
Therefore if he goes, so do you.?------ I have intimidated by Hedan as a reader of CD, and my Human rights have already been violated. Are you saying that you run China Daily? Are you telling me that the Law in your Democratic country is in fact sentencing the victims with the same punishment given to the criminal by nature? Then provide me with the evidence of exactly which country you are from? Your profession? Any other evidence that is needed to have the matter properly identified and resolved. I'm happy to have a go with you! You have the responsibility to provide all these evidence by law. Otherwise you are the evidence proving the conclusion that democracy in your country means unlawful and criminal.
Dobridan, Hedan posted his baby on China Daily where we discuss about the development of China, evidenced he/she has the capacity, right? To remove him from CD can provide better effect for him/her to take care of the baby, which is his/her duty and paramount consideration by Right of Children of the International Law, right? Using children as traffic is the violation of Children抯 rights, right by International Law, right? Which country are you from, Mr. 揥hite European Male? I need to check your unlawful conducts in reference to your country's law. Will you be able to provide the information?
Forging false authority of China Daily? Moderator, add this repentless, and Dobridan on the list of my application for removal. Ground and evidence are as shown above.
I give you time to go back to discuss with you bosses in case there are many, and come back, I抣l have fun with you.