Views: 3768|Replies: 8

The Hegemony of the Almighty Dollar -- PART 1 [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-8-3 20:09:48 |Display all floors
The Hegemony of the Almighty Dollar -- PART 1

01 August 2014.

For 70 years, a key element of American power has been the dollar's standing as the world's premier currency.

But Washington's repeated use of economic sanctions as a foreign policy weapon has encouraged other powers to consider financial alternatives.

Since World War II, America's geopolitical supremacy has rested not only on military might, but also on the dollar's standing as the world's leading transactional and reserve currency.

Economically, dollar primacy extracts "seignorage", the difference between the cost of printing money and its value from other countries, and minimizes U.S. firms exchange rate risk.

Its real importance, though, is strategic: dollar primacy lets America cover its chronic current account and fiscal deficits by issuing more of its own currency. This is precisely how Washington has funded its hard power projection for over half a century.

Since the 1970s, a pillar of dollar primacy has been the greenback's role as the dominant currency in which oil and gas are priced, and in which international hydrocarbon sales are invoiced and settled.

This helps keep worldwide dollar demand high.

It also feeds energy producers accumulation of dollar surpluses that reinforce the dollar's standing as the world's premier reserve asset, and that can be "recycled" into the U.S. economy to cover American deficits.

Many assume that the dollar's prominence in energy markets derives from its wider status as the world's foremost transactional and reserve currency.

But the dollar's role in these markets is neither natural nor a function of its broader dominance.

Rather, it was engineered by U.S. policymakers after the Bretton Woods monetary order collapsed in the early 1970s, ending the initial version of dollar primacy (dollar hegemony 1.0).

Linking the dollar to international oil trading was key to creating a new version of dollar primacy (dollar hegemony 2.0)  and, by extension, in financing another forty years of American hegemony.

Dollar primacy was first enshrined at the 1944 Bretton Woods conference, where America's non-communist allies acceded to Washington's blueprint for a postwar international monetary order.

Britain's delegation, headed by Lord Keynes, and virtually every other participating country, save the United States, favored creating a new multilateral currency through the fledgling International Monetary Fund (IMF) as the chief source of global liquidity.

But this would have thwarted American ambitions for a dollar-centered monetary order.
Even though almost all participants preferred the multilateral option, America's overwhelming relative power ensured that, in the end, its preferences prevailed.

So, under the Bretton Woods gold exchange standard, the dollar was pegged to gold and other currencies were pegged to the dollar, making it the main form of international liquidity.

There was, however, a fatal contradiction in Washington's dollar-based vision.

The only way America could diffuse enough dollars to meet worldwide liquidity needs was by running open-ended current account deficits.

As Western Europe and Japan recovered and regained competitiveness, these deficits grew.

Throw in America's own burgeoning demand for dollars to fund rising consumption, welfare state expansion, and global power projection, and the U.S. money supply soon exceeded U.S. gold reserves.

From the 1950s, Washington worked to persuade or coerce foreign dollar holders not to exchange greenbacks for gold.

But insolvency could be staved off for only so long: in August 1971, President Richard Nixon suspended dollar-gold convertibility, ending the gold exchange standard; by 1973, fixed exchange rates were gone, too.

These events raised fundamental questions about the long-term soundness of a dollar-based monetary order.

To preserve its role as chief provider of international liquidity, the U.S. would have to continue running current account deficits.

But those deficits were ballooning, for Washington's abandonment of Bretton Woods intersected with two other watershed developments: America became a net oil importer in the early 1970s; and the assertion of market power by key members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in 1973-1974 caused a 500 percent increase in oil prices, exacerbating the strain on the U.S. balance of payments.

With the link between the dollar and gold severed and exchange rates no longer fixed, the prospect of ever-larger U.S. deficits aggravated concerns about the dollar's long-term value.

These concerns had special resonance for major oil producers.


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2014-8-20 09:39:29 |Display all floors
Please understand why gold based monetary system would fail.  This is explained in the 259 Trillion Vs 5 Trillion series.  You can download a free video presentation on how the monetary system works.  It shows why gold would always fail (it has fail so many times in history). The failure of gold based system was inevitable. It prevented economic growth.  Remember the Great Depression in the 30s? Gold played a big part in that.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-8-24 09:20:18 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2014-8-26 22:30:27 |Display all floors
jordan_c_fan Post time: 2014-8-24 09:20
The sad fact is that the USA is perfectly capable of strengthening its currency by using its manpo ...

The money printing is controlled by the Fed. So they can revalue the currency upward with ease.  However they are following simple protocol, which is to issue currency when it is demanded in the system.  QE is force feeding currency into the system.  Natural resources etc has nothing much to do with the strength of the currency.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2014-8-31 09:23:28 |Display all floors
Dollar and fiat currency become PONZI game if exploited to benefit the greedy super elites who don't work and always lazy like the british and european royal families.  

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2014-10-1 17:00:11 |Display all floors
bushier Post time: 2014-8-31 09:23
Dollar and fiat currency become PONZI game if exploited to benefit the greedy super elites who don't ...

Most super elites work very hard.  it is not true they are lazy.  Some work even when they are on wheelchair.  Royals aren't a good example of the super elites.  in fact, royals has lost most of their power anyway.  Most countries keeping them for a trophy necessity.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2014-10-4 23:56:55 |Display all floors
Are you yourself a member of the superelites ? What kind of ridiculous thing you suggested about superelites are very hardworking ?

Show me an example of which super elite who works hard for the money ? Are an ass kisser ?

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.