Readers’ Blog

A Qatari Punch of Britain in the Face of Trump

Viewed 1021 times 2017-6-22 17:36 |System category:News| political

In the second term of Obama’s presidency, we witnessed significant changes in the implementation plan of the National Security Strategy (NSS). To implement this document, Britain and the U.S. had agreed to increase the military and security role of England in the Gulf and east of the Suez Canal and accordingly the U.S. has the opportunity to consolidate its influence in Southeast Asia as well. Many articles have been written on this issue by analysts in world’s leading political circles and thinks tanks. In the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress, Pentagon, Foreign Ministry and the CIA officials implicitly pointed out that the Middle East project was handed over to the CIA and the Pentagon became responsible to focus on Southeast Asia. 

Analyzing the changes occurred in the British grand strategy, it is clearly visible that unlike its own decision in the 1970s to withdraw from the Suez Canal and the Gulf, Britain in recent years sought to step out of the shadows and to play a more direct role in the Middle East. The implementation of this strategy has been accelerated after Brexit. 

Britain’s strategic turning started from 2010 and was officially delivered to the foreign ministers of the six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) during a secret meeting on the sideline of the UN General Assembly in 201 4 by Philip Hammond. 

Hammond declared his commitment to control Iran and then called for the expansion of his country’s military presence in the Gulf and emphasized the need to set up military contracts for assigning the military bases in the Gulf to Britain. British military agreements with Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the UAE in recent years was in line with this grand strategy. A strategy initiated based on Britain’s agreement with the Pentagon during the administration of President Obama. 

This strategy led Theresa May to emphasize the need for solidarity of the Arab states against Iran and Russia in a close session with the Gulf Cooperation Countries in Manama in 07 December 2016. She proposed the following plans: transforming the Gulf Cooperation Council to the Gulf Cooperation Union, launching a joint Gulf police and a joint Gulf naval forces and following the strategic plan to isolate Putin and Russia in the Middle East, particularly Egypt, Syria and Iraq. 

Participation of Tony Blair in formulation of Vision 2030 and persuading Riyadh to support Haider al-Abadi to reduce his affiliation to Iran and the participation of England to reform the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, and making the support for the Brotherhood by Qatar on condition that the Brotherhood and Hamas discard ideas by Sayyid Qutb show that England’s agreement with the U.S. was that London to become a strategic loyal partner of Washington in the Gulf and therefore President Obama trusted the Great Britain and opened up the space for the presence of London. 

From the beginning of his presidency, Trump paid little attention to this strategic agreement with England and made close relations with the Arab leaders of the Gulf. In a season, Trump repeatedly talked and visit the Arab leaders and took the preliminary agreements in financial, military and security fields. On the contrary, the several trips of Theresa May to the Gulf was indirectly a reminder and warning notice or even a sort of England’s warning to Washington which were deliberately ignored by Trump. Trump's first visit to Saudi Arabia and the gathering of all Arab leaders in Riyadh summit were a gross violation and disregard by Washington for Great Britain as a loyal strategic partner. Trump wanted the entire of Arab petrodollars fully for his own and the U.S. economy and therefore paid no attention to the previous agreements of the former American leaders with the UN and the UK. 

Qatar Crisis could be counted as an (indirect) iron fist of the UK in the face of Trump so that he put himself together and become committed to his country’s international agreements. However, it seems that Trump was not sleeping to be waken up in this way. Actually, he is a smart merchant who needs all the revenues from Saudi Arabia and other Arab states ofthe Gulf for the U.S. economy and for this reason he easily seizes the shares of his European allies. It seems that security crises and the probable war between Qatar and Saudi Arabia has no importance for the U.S. as long as the petrodollars earned by Trump are safe and secure.

(Opinions of the writer in this blog don't represent those of China Daily.)




Shake hands

Like 0 Share


Comment (0 comments)

facelist doodle Doodle board

You need to login to comment Login | register


Recent comments

  • Mohamed bin Salman and Saudi Arabia's 2030 vision 2017-7-3 22:55

    Human rights, gender equality, due process of law, separation of religion and state, science over ignorance and religion, efficiency, consumer rights - I could go on and on about the qualities that the WEST has given to the less advanced world - and that EVERY human LONGS for!

  • Mohamed bin Salman and Saudi Arabia's 2030 vision 2017-7-3 22:11

    Ted180: Eventually history will run its course and Arabia will be westernized. Just a matter of time.
    Westernization is the path to perdition, and it will never happen in non-west countries.

Star blogger










Most Viewed

Most commented

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.