Views: 4438|Replies: 6

Can China, Japan avoid clash in 2013? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 4

Post time 2013-1-30 12:55:29 |Display all floors
In much of the world, the long curve of history continues dragging nations to the brink of conflict. Take Northeast Asia, where recent tensions between China and Japan risk erupting into conflict. The Senkaku/Diaoyu islands, home to rocky outcroppings and nearby resource rich waters, have become the latest potential flashpoint.


What started as a manageable confrontation in the East China Sea between Chinese fishing vessels and Japanese Coast Guard cutters has now escalated well beyond a dispute over natural resources. Chinese fighter jets have shadowed Japanese planes in the skies above. Japan has threatened to fire warning shots. A hawkish Chinese general has warned that would be their only shot, while Beijing announced plans to formally survey the islands. The U.S. has weighed in against any unilateral action that challenges Japan's administration of the area.

If there’s a red line where rhetoric and posturing turns into open conflict (intended or otherwise) we’re close to crossing it.
And neither side shows any signs of meaningful compromise with a hawkish Shinzo Abe back as Japan’s prime minister, and Xi Jinping inheriting an increasingly nationalistic country in transition. The spiral of escalation, once started, can be difficult to unwind, especially once any real shots are fired by the increasing number of naval ships and air force patrols. Similarly, if either country attempts to land on the islands domestic calls for retaliation will be hard, if not impossible, to resist.
-
Further complicating this current territorial flare-up is a centuries old rivalry. An economically emboldened China, with a military budget to match, has begun reasserting itself as a regional power. For centuries, it was the undisputed hub of the region. But redressing past harm, either from early 20th Century unequal trade relations or Word War II remain a potent force in its foreign policy, a legacy Europe has managed to overcome. Enemy and ally alike integrated into NATO decades ago with Germany and Italy sitting alongside the U.S., Britain and France. Asia needs, but sorely lacks, an influential or even coherent regional security organization. Nothing of the sort exists or is planned.

There are, it is true, some small positive signs. Japan sent, and China received an official delegation to discuss the territorial dispute. Former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama visited China’s Nanjing Massacre memorial, which marks Imperial Japan’s World War II atrocities. And just today, Bloomberg reported that Xi was said by a Japanese envoy to be considering holding a summit to discuss the crisis.

So, for now at least, the lines of communication remain open while both sides try to rein in their more hawkish extremes. But space for rational discussion has been shrinking under the pressure of nationalistic vitriol, adding to the risk of a conflict that would have devastating results for the region and international trade.

Yet conflict has never been preordained. New histories can and have been forged. Consider the U.S.-Vietnam relationship of today versus just forty years ago. Trade has replaced hostilities. Americans travel to tourist destinations in straw hats rather than as soldiers in helmets.
While the past should not be forgotten, neither should it be allowed to replay itself in an endless, self-destructive loop. Hopefully that's a lesson not lost on Beijing and Tokyo in 2013.


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-2-2 05:22:08 |Display all floors
the US gave japan full control of those islands, and it's hard for china to claim it back eventhough it's hers to begin with...this is a WAR must have for both sides (china vs the US/jpn) in order to see who actually owns those islands  {:soso_e127:}{:soso_e115:}
a man who uses his hands is a laborer. one who uses his hands and his mind is a craftsman. but he who uses his hands, his mind, and his heart, is an artist...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2013-2-2 08:45:31 |Display all floors
that sounds impossible...
nothing I have is truely mine...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2013-2-2 12:35:45 |Display all floors
Of course ,nobody benefits from it except the US.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2013-2-2 13:35:02 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Post time 2013-2-3 00:54:13 |Display all floors
The United States doesn't want a war between China and Japan. Why would we want a war between our two biggest trading partners? All three countries have enough problems of their own to deal with. Personally I think the very talk of war between China and Japan shows a lack of understanding.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2013-2-3 05:11:08 |Display all floors
China doesn't need this fight. There are other, much more important areas of war nowadays. For example, if China issues a gold-based yuan as a global currency, the dollar will immediately collapse. Why do you want to play stupid 19th century war games when you have the economic power to pressure US?
As far as Japan is concerned, it is a copuntry of old people with a catastrophic demography. Wait 15 years and there will be no Japanese youth to protect the island.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.