- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 914 Hour
- Reading permission
seneca Post time: 2012-10-19 10:45
Sans Souci was reaching for his prozac...
...and his hand inadvertently wandered, wandered, wan ...
Typical chosen subterfuge,..if you cannot refute the message attack the messenger.
Well heres the message Stupid now what do you find wrong in it??
IPCC criticised by tens of thousands of informed scientists
But I also reminded you that tens of thousands of informed scientists have criticised the IPCC’s findings. So I urged you to look up their conclusions on the internet. The main petitions are:
The Heidelberg Appeal (4000 signatures including 62 Nobel prizewinners),
The Oregon Petition (31,000 accredited scientists),
The Manhattan Declaration (600 research climatologists),
The Petition to the United Nations (100 geoscientists),
Petition to the Canadian Prime Minister (60 climate experts),
The Leipzig Declaration (100 geoscientists),
The Statement from Atmospheric Scientists (50),
Petition to the German Chancellor (200 German scientists),
Statement from the American Physical Society (150 physical scientists),
Petition to President Obama (100 leading climate researchers),
UN Climate Scientists speak out on Global Warming (700, many previously involved with the IPCC).
All are critical of the notion of man-made global warming, and all of them (with signatures and accreditations) are accessible via Google. I also provided you with numerous quotes from scientists who had been involved with the IPCC as reviewers and/or contributors. They were extremely critical of the IPCC process, and I would have expected you to take those statements seriously. For instance Dr Vincent Gray, climate consultant, long-standing member of the New Zealand Royal Society and expert reviewer for the IPCC, publicly described the IPCC’s climate change statements as “An orchestrated litany of lies”. To support the IPCC’s statements seems to embrace political correctness and ideology, certainly not science.