Views: 3483|Replies: 5

New commander in chief is Romney , Kenyan chap gay marriage did a trick [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-5-12 04:26:12 |Display all floors
Obama falls behind Romney in polls after endorsing gay marriage

11 May, 2012

President Obama’s re-election campaign roped in millions of dollars in donations this week after the incumbent formally endorsed same-sex marriage for Americans. According to the latest polling, though, that might not be enough to cinch another term.
The results of Rasmussen Reports’ most recent presidential tracking poll reveal that US President Barack Obama is behind Republican Party frontrunner Mitt Romney by as much as seven percentage points. The research group’s latest results, published early Friday, suggests that only 43 percent of the American public would be willing to right now cast a ballot to re-elect President Obama; Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, received 50 percent of the vote.
Rasmussen confirms that this is the first time that their daily tracking poll has put support for Romney at or above the 50 percent mark. It also makes his largest lead ever over President Obama.
The results of the poll were published by Rasmussen on Friday morning and, according to the company, come from answers conducted during a telephone survey of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. Additionally, Rasmussen Reports relies on an online survey tool to question additional participants off the Web, and in all say they polled from a sample of 1,500 people with a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points.
A separate study published on Thursday out of Quinnipac University in Ohio suggests that Obama could be ahead of his opponent, but only barely if so. In that poll, the incumbent is allocated the most support from likely voters, but only wins the survey by a one point margin. In that poll, Obama just inches past Romney with 45 percent of the votes to the Republican’s 44.
Aside from the statistics, it was a major campaign week for both candidates. Down the road, however, this weeks’ happenings could very well shape the rest of the race for the White House.
President Obama made headlines around the globe earlier in the week by formally announcing that he supports same-sex marriage for Americans. In the immediate aftermath, his campaign announced that they had raked in millions of dollars in contributions for his re-election but Rasmussen’s results may signal that those on the fence may have been put off by his newly announced stance. Similarly, Romney’s lead comes hours after allegations of anti-homosexual behavior as a youth surfaced.
In a video released to the Web from the Obama campaign on Thursday, Romney is portrayed as being "backwards on equality."
Given Rasmussen’s statistics, that might be just want America wants.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-5-12 10:26:50 |Display all floors

Russia should urgently build few thousands more biochemical and nuclear warheads me think. And since Mr Putin have cash in his budget this shall be done rather urgently.

Better to be ready than sorry.
New York Times
Part 1


Published: May 11, 2012
WASHINGTON — Mitt Romney’s recent declaration that Russia is America’s top geopolitical adversary drew raised eyebrows and worse from many Democrats, some Republicans and the Russians themselves, all of whom suggested that Mr. Romney was misguidedly stuck in a cold war mind-set.

But his statement was not off the cuff — and it was not the first time Mr. Romney had stirred debate over his hawkish views on Russia. Interviews with Republican foreign policy experts close to his campaign and his writings on the subject show that his stance toward Russia reflects a broader foreign policy view that gives great weight to economic power and control of natural resources. It also exhibits Mr. Romney’s confidence that his private-sector experience would make him a better negotiator on national security issues than President Obama has been.

Mr. Romney’s views on Russia have set off disagreements among some of his foreign policy advisers. They put him in sync with the more conservative members of his party in Congress, who have similarly criticized Mr. Obama as being too accommodating to Russia, and generally reflect the posture of some neoconservatives.

But they have frequently put him at odds with members of the Republican foreign policy establishment, like Senator Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, who was defeated in a primary this week, and the party’s shrinking band of foreign policy “realists” — those who advocate a less ideological and more pragmatic view of relations with rival powers.

The Romney campaign has been critical of Mr. Obama’s record and positions on a variety of national security issues, including containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions and confronting China’s rise. But many of the positions taken by Mr. Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, have either been vague or not fundamentally different from those of the administration.

Russia, however, is an exception, one where Mr. Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, has carved out a clear contrast to Mr. Obama, who came to office promising to “reset” relations with Moscow, only to find that Russia can be a difficult partner. Just this week, President Vladimir V. Putin abruptly canceled his plans to visit the United States next week for the Group of 8 summit meeting and for talks with Mr. Obama at Camp David.

Mr. Romney was a leading opponent of the most recent arms-reduction treaty with Russia, ratified by the Senate and signed last year by Mr. Obama. Russia figures prominently in Mr. Romney’s book, where he calls it one of four competitors for world leadership, along with the United States, China and “violent jihadism” embraced by Iran and terrorist groups.

Some advisers close to Mr. Romney, who declined to be quoted or identified by name, say Russia is a good illustration of his belief that national security threats are closely tied to economic power — in this case stemming from Russia’s oil and gas reserves, which it has used to muscle European countries dependent on energy imports.  

They also cite his tendency to view foreign policy conflicts as zero-sum negotiations.  Mr. Romney, an accomplished deal-maker at Bain Capital, views his negotiating skills as an advantage he holds over Mr. Obama.

Mr. Romney signaled his stance toward Russia two years ago, when he argued that the New Start missile treaty with Russia should be rejected, putting him at odds with a long line of former Republican secretaries of state and defense. A number of arms control specialists said they were startled by some of Mr. Romney’s assertions, like fretting about intercontinental ballistic missiles mounted on bombers.  

“It would be really fun to watch a Russian bomber with an SS-25 strung to its stomach try to take off,” said Steve Pifer, a former American ambassador to Ukraine and now director of the Arms Control Initiative at the Brookings Institution. “Some of the arguments just left people scratching their heads.”

Within hours, rebuttal pieces to Mr. Romney’s position, laid out in an op-ed article in The Washington Post, were being circulated among arms control experts. Mr. Lugar, who had spent decades working on arms control issues, publicly disparaged some of Mr. Romney’s arguments as “discredited objections.”

Mr. Romney felt the missile treaty was a bad deal partly because it would impede American defenses by preventing ballistic missile silos from being converted to missile defense sites, while treaty supporters said that was not an issue because American officials prefer to build missile defense installations from the ground up.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-5-12 10:28:22 |Display all floors
New York Times

Published: May 11, 2012

(Page 2 of 2)

Mr. Romney also criticized a White House decision scrapping a proposed antiballistic missile shield in Eastern Europe and building in its place a reconfigured system to shoot down short- and medium-range Iranian missiles. Mr. Romney argued that Mr. Obama had caved to Russian pressure, trading away a crucial program with little in return. Administration officials say their reconfigured system offers better protection for American allies.

Mr. Romney’s more recent statements on Russia have also drawn criticism from nonpartisan Russia experts who say he mischaracterizes Russia’s potential economic power and paints an inaccurate picture of Russian recalcitrance. Republicans close to Mr. Romney acknowledge that politics are a factor, but they also say Mr. Romney is driven by fears that Mr. Putin will continue political repression and use his country’s energy wealth to finance military expansion.

Some former diplomats and Russia specialists, and some leading Republicans in Congress, have also questioned his characterization of the country as America’s major foe. Many experts, including some close to his campaign, see a declining power that the United States will need to help manage global challenges. Some analysts also say Mr. Romney understates the help Russia has provided in dealing with rogue states, like backing a heavy-arms embargo and other sanctions against Iran in 2010.

“There’s a whole school of thought that Russia is one you need to work with to solve other problems in the world, rather than being the problem,” said Thomas de Waal, a Russia expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Russia has blocked United Nations Security Council efforts to end violence in Syria, drawing a rebuke from the Obama administration. But analysts also point out Russia’s support for the Iran arms embargo, its cancellation of a surface-to-air missile system sale to Iran and its allowing supplies to be sent through Russia to troops in Afghanistan.

Mr. Romney says natural resources could vault Russia to a position of global influence rivaling any nation by midcentury. But many analysts say  Russia’s fate is so closely tied to oil exports that anything short of a sustained rise in prices will lead to cuts in spending on the military and social programs. Citigroup estimates that oil must reach $150 a barrel in coming years (from current export prices of $120) for Russia to pay for Mr. Putin’s spending promises.

The co-chairman of Mr. Romney’s Russia working group, Leon Aron, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote this month that in the short term, “Russia’s most serious risk stems from a near-fatal dependence on the price of oil,” and that it could face a fiscal crisis as soon as 2014 that depletes cash for the military and other commitments.  (Mr. Aron declined to comment, but friends say he would never argue, as Mr. Romney has, that Russia is America’s “No. 1 geopolitical foe.”)

Some experts add that the only way the Russian economy could reach the heights Mr. Romney fears would be through a wholesale economic liberalization — one that would be cheered by Western countries.

“It would mean radically reforming and changing the Putin system,” said Angela Stent, a Russia expert at Georgetown University and a former national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2012-5-13 05:40:45 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-5-13 07:56:48 |Display all floors
LaughsatYou Post time: 2012-5-13 05:40
I might have to agree here, I was sure Obama would would win reelection until he did this. He is und ...

Obama made big mistake

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-5-14 05:12:42 |Display all floors
This post was edited by SMITHI at 2012-5-14 05:13

Amerikkkkkkkkkkan ally Australia seem to be against Obama too?

Doctors' group says heterosexual marriage better for kidsABC
Updated May 14, 2012

The Australian Medical Association (AMA) has distanced itself from a group of prominent doctors who say children are better off when raised by heterosexual parents, rather than same-sex couples.

Around 150 medical practitioners from the group Doctors for the Family, including a member of Victoria's Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, say children raised in heterosexual relationships "do better in all parameters".

The group has signed a submission to the Senate inquiry into marriage equality, opposing same-sex marriage and asserting that marriage between a man and a woman is the "basis for a healthy society".

The submission says that marriage, as it is currently defined under the Marriage Act 2004, is more stable than same-sex marriages.

Doctors for the Family's convener, Lachlan Dunjey, told ABC News Radio the group is concerned about the health consequences for children of gay marriages.

"It's well proven that children who grow up with a mother and a father in a biological mother-and-father family do better than children who don't have the opportunity to grow up in that kind of family," he said.

But AMA president Steve Hambleton has rejected the claims, saying there is no evidence that children with same-sex parents are any different to those with heterosexual parents.

"There is a growing body of evidence that says there's no difference in their psychological development, their general health, their sexual orientation," he said.

Dr Hambleton says the opinions expressed in the submission do not reflect the views of the wider medical community, saying there are nearly 90,000 doctors in Australia.

He says doctors must be mindful of putting their opinions forward because they hold influential positions in society.

"That's part of the reason why it's a bit disturbing that these opinions have been proffered. It's certainly not the opinion of the AMA body of doctors," he said.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has dismissed the submission and says discrimination within the Marriage Act should end.

"A child being brought up in a loving home is far more important - and that quality of parenting is far more important - than any of the criticisms that have been waged by this group of individuals," she said.

ACT Deputy Chief Minister Andrew Barr is openly gay and says the doctors' arguments are "stupid".

"I think that's one of the more ridiculous propositions that's ever been put in Australian public debate. I don't know who these doctors are but it certainly doesn't accord with every other piece of research that's out there on this issue," he said.

Immediate explanation

Meanwhile, Victoria's Deputy Chief Psychiatrist, Professor Kuravilla George, who was appointed to the board of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission by the State Government, is one of the doctors who signed the petition.

Victoria's Mental Health Minister is seeking an urgent explanation from the state's Chief Psychiatrist, Ruth Vine, over her deputy's decision to join forces with Doctors For The Family.

A spokesman for Victoria's Mental Health Minister, Mary Wooldridge, says the Government was unaware of the submission and is seeking an immediate explanation.

Professor George has declined the ABC's request for an interview but confirmed his involvement with the group.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.