voice_cd Post time: 2012-4-5 17:54
Greatlady, thank you for your concern. Banning someone is the last thing we want to do, we are very ...
Due to the current systems, it is hardly for the readers to read what he/she posted when some related members were banned. I think that is the part of system that need to be improved !
Since I know banning someone is the last choice of your work , so I as a reader also should not be worried that you become haters tools in their hands. This is International forum , a Chinese organized forum as well, I've noticed that Seneca did contribute his plenty of times on forum as others, and with patience to explain in English study Section. Chinese sayings: 没有功劳，亦有苦劳，Have you ever considered that ?
Or I'd better ask you to show the proof publically which of Seneca's post got him banned ?
Is that possible ?
As you said welcome for the free speech, is that the potential reason that Seneca got himself trapped as he talked too often of the government problems in China ?
As I am only guessing the reasons here and got no confidence to what you said as to the free speeches were welcomed as I am afraid of being named China-basher easily by few here.
If these few serious participants are all gone As I named in the first of my post, who would like to visit just few haters and attackers formed forum ?