Views: 12093|Replies: 74

The Czechoslovak legions: myth, reality, gold and glory   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-7 21:23:30 |Display all floors
This post was edited by JFenix at 2012-1-7 21:29

The Czechoslovak legions occupy an almost legendary place in Czech history. They comprise the armed forces that fought during and after World War I on the allied side in pursuit of an independent Czechoslovakia. The biggest force, and most potent myths, centre on the Russian force, which became embroiled in the civil war, spending three years and travelling thousands of miles before returning home. We look at the myths and facts about their exploits.


The Czechoslovak legions were a potent myth and reality for the First Czechoslovak Republic created in 1918. Many of their military leaders filled the top ranks of the new nation’s army. Some finally went over the edge creating anti-democratic parties and siding with the Nazi occupiers at the end of the 1930’s.


Physical landmarks, such as Prague’s bridge Most Legií is named after them, though it was constructed earlier and the name was changed during the Nazi and Communist regimes. A memorial to the legionnaires also dominates Prague’s Palacký square.


One of the city’s interwar architectural masterpieces, the bank founded for the returning legionnaires, Banka Československých legii or Legiobanka, is a rondo-cubist masterpiece by celebrated Czech architect Josef Gočár.


But it is perhaps at the psychological level that the foundations go deeper. More about that later.


From the start of World War I, Czechs abroad started to form national units to fight on the Allied side. Small at first, their numbers and significance started to snowball when they were supplemented by prisoners and deserters from the Austro-Hungarian army fighting alongside Germany.


All this fitted in well with the strategy of Tomáš G. Masaryk, the leader of Czechoslovakia’s independence movement and later first president. Ivan Šedivý is a specialist in modern Czechoslovak history at Prague’s Charles University.



“He knew that an independent state would need an army so in many articles he wrote that the Czechoslovak movement against Austria-Hungary needed its independent armed forces. So Masaryk tried to create such forces and this happened in Russia, in France and at the end of the war in Italy and the United States.”


But the Russian Revolution in 1917 represented a major hurdle to this plan. While the newly established independent Czechoslovak force proved its fighting worth in the offensive of Alexander Kerensky’s provisional government, that government was soon overturned by the Bolshevik revolution with Lenin opting for peace.


The Czechoslovak forces wanted to carry on fighting and now faced the challenge of how to get to France. Their way back west and to the northern Baltic ports was blocked by German armies. They faced the choice of a hazardous trip south towards the Middle East or further east along the trans-Siberian railway to the port of Vladivostok. They opted for the latter route and what was to become a three-year odyssey.


Unfortunately, they soon became caught up in the civil war between the Bolshevik government centred in Moscow and opposition forces backed by the Allies who were angered by Lenin’s unilateral exit from the war. Ivan Šedivý again:


“At the beginning Masaryk did not want the legions to fight the Soviet Bolsheviks but after the Chelyabinsk incident in May 1918 when fighting broke out between Bolsheviks and legionnaires the Czechoslovak corps fought with the so-called White forces. But I think it was not a crucial force for winning the war.”


The Czechoslovak legion represented a well organised and potent fighting force which occupied large swathes of Siberia. It made use of armoured trains along the railway to ferry forces to key points. Its imminent arrival is believed to have contributed to the decision by local Bolsheviks to execute the Tsar and his family at Eskaterinburg in July 1918. But even so, it was still a fairly small force.


“At this time the Czechoslovak corps had about 70,000 Czech soldiers and about 20-30,000 Russian soldiers, so we are talking about a force of about 100,000. So it was not a force that could have been able to defeat the Bolsheviks in fact.”


  
Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

                          -  James Bryant Conant

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-7 21:32:12 |Display all floors
This post was edited by JFenix at 2012-1-7 21:32

Part two:

The Czechs forces also became disillusioned with one of the main White generals, Admiral Kolchak.

“The Czech attitude towards the Kolchak and Kolchak’s government rapidly changed over time. At the beginning from 1918 the Czech legions crucially supported Kolchak’s forces. He created a government with Czech help. But Kolchak was not a democrat. He created the government with Cossack and ataman’s help so his government was not very democratic. So Czech forces started to be neutral in fighting in Siberia.”

The legion even paved the way for Kolchak’s capture and execution by Bolshevik forces at the start of 1920.

The most intriguing story about the Czechoslovak legions’ Siberian journey concerns the rumours that they kept one of eight wagons of the Tsar’s gold after the rest were handed over to the Bolsheviks as part of the deal to get home. Professor Šedivý.

“Nowadays we can read in many Russian newspapers that this gold was stolen by Czechoslovakia. To tell the truth, there is no evidence it was so. On the other hand no one can argue it was not.”

He says a telegram found in the archives talking about the transport of a gold cargo, ostensibly for medical use, through the port of Trieste for Czechoslovakia lends some support to the Tsarist gold story. But the Czechoslovak legion had branched out into many money spinning ventures during its time in Siberia and the gold could have also stemmed from them.

“The Czech legions had a very wide economic infrastructure and had this financial office and this office carried out very broad scale business with products and with currency and gold. So it is possible that many financial and gold resources later deposited in the so-called Bank of the Czechoslovak Legions, which was created, I think in 1920, were mostly from the economic transactions of the Czechoslovak legions and not from this gold of the Tsarist family.

We must have in mind that the legions were about three years in Siberia and made business with the Russians, with the Chinese and with the Japanese and so on. What is more, they obtained some part of the money from the soldiers.”

World War I was long over by the time the last members of the Czechoslovak legion shipped out of Vladivostok by April 1920. Many of the newly returned found posts in the army with their long combat service a major factor in their favour.

“They accounted for approximately one third of all men in the newly created Czechoslovak army but absolutely prevailed in the high command. Almost all generals were legionaries, especially those from Russia. These were people such as General Syrový.”

General Jan Syrový became a four-star general and Czechoslovak army Chief of Staff. He also served as a reluctant prime minister during the Munich crisis in 1938.

For Professor Šedivý the colourful stories of the exiled Czechoslovak forces provided a powerful image of the independence struggle during the First Republic. Later on, after the capitulation of Munich and later Nazi occupation, Communist takeover in 1948 and Soviet-led invasion of 1968, it provided Czechs with one clear example of national military exploits.

The uncomfortable fact though is that far more Czechs and Slovaks died during World War I in the Austro-Hungarian army fighting the Allies than in the small military units that fought alongside them.

“There is little comparison: about 5,000 legionnaires were killed in the war. But on the Austro-Hungarian side during the war there were 110-150,000 killed or even more. In fact, the Czechs did not fight as one man against the Austro-Hungarian Empire. It was just part of the nation.”

But there again, as the saying goes, it is the winner who writes history. And after World War I, Czechoslovakia was clearly on the winning side.

  
Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

                          -  James Bryant Conant

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-7 22:27:18 |Display all floors
It is interesting the czech-slovak role in the russian revolution.

And what might be lesser known is the tens of thousands of 'white' russians that fled to other countries in eastern/central europe after the revolution.

They were later 'abducted' by red army forces as they liberated eastern europe.

I read a report that suggested a considerable number of these white russians and ukranians getting abducted in slovakia from 1943-47.  

Tens of thousands were there.  And remember these were the opponents to the bolsheviks, many joined with the axis forces to try to overthrow the communists and take russia back.

Interesting history.  We talk of Stalin's paranioa, but we don't always lay the context.  The russian revolution certainly had sown some seeds that came back to bite them in WWII.
  
Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

                          -  James Bryant Conant

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-7 23:29:45 |Display all floors
Capek on the Czech Legion

Excerpt from ``At the Crossroads of Europe'' (introduction to a book of the same title, published by the PEN club of Prague, 1938), as reprinted in Peter Kussi (ed.), Towards the Radical Center: A Karel Capek Reader (Highland Park, New Jersey: Catbird Press, 1990), p. 404.

In substance, Czechoslovakia is a nation of stay-at-homes, not favored by nature with adequate opportunities to go forth as adventurers and conquerors. And yet was it not these stay-at-homes, these mild and sedentary people, who fought in the Great War for the freedom of their country on the battlefields of Serbia and the Dobrudja, in Lombardy and in the Argonnes, in the Urals, and in Siberia as far as Vladivostok? Was it not they who waged war for their native Czechoslovakia in the French, Italian, Serbian and Russian armies? Was it not they who, when taken prisoner, asked for arms to fight against the Habsburg Empire --- men condemned in advance to die as rebels on the scaffold if the Allies should not win a decisive victory? Seventy thousand ill-armed volunteer soldiers had to cut their way through the Siberian tundra in order once again to reach the battlefields of Europe, and although throughout all this more than 8,000 kilometer journey they had to make their way through an alien and hostile land with their weapons in their hands, as they went along they founded their own printing press, they printed books and newspapers, they established a bank of their own and a theater, wrote down from memory the plays and musical compositions of their faraway homeland, arranged sports and athletics, used the old linoleum which covered the floors of the cars of the Trans-Siberian Railway to make blocks for the illustrations in their comic paper, carried their workshops with them, hunted up their forage in Turkestan, in Mongolia, in China; maintained communications, order and public services over a line thousands of kilometers in length; and after two years of this self-conducted adventurous journey from West to East round the world, returned on board Japanese ships to their native country as disciplined regiments, capable of taking the field again the very next day. Those of you who know something of the War from your own experiences can judge the moral and physical achievement of these seventy thousand young men and aging fathers led by thirty-year-old generals.

================================

WWI - The Great war for their freedom

LaughsatYou,

Do you still think they would of been better off staying under the austrian-hungarian empire?
  
Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

                          -  James Bryant Conant

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2012-1-9 03:07:45 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-9 04:16:14 |Display all floors
LUCKY!!!!!!!

LUCKY!!!!!

How can you say such blamshemy!

The ottomans WERE there.  Why do you think there are musIims in bosnia and albania?  Do you realize how many serbians lost their lives fighting the ottomans?

You're acting like the austrian-hungarian empire was 'protecting' those people.

They didn't give a ---- anymore than the ottomans.

They were one and the same.  

Ask the freakin people if they would of rather lived under the goddamn austrian-hungarian empire.

You're really pissing me off with such stupidity.
  
Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

                          -  James Bryant Conant

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2012-1-9 04:20:12 |Display all floors
You are a really cold-hearted person.

The austrian-hungarians were NO BETTER.
  
Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

                          -  James Bryant Conant

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.