- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 576 Hour
- Reading permission
And and and......|
Do we even need to waste our time reading your further lengthy craps, knowing that your only able to copy and paste and distort facts, and nothing really comes from your own brain-(suppose you have one)
Are you able to explain how you tried to 'revamp' those unbiased articles and 'adapt' them to support your ridiculous points?
Like a cadidate who turns into an election fraud, who lost in votes and have to manipulate to win back? (That's why I said male chauvinist shows tendency of dictatorship, when they are consistently busted and humilated by their own deeds.)
But I do see you slowly progress on your IQ, because instead of quoting unbiased articles and remove the unbiased parts
and once again pointed out by others, you finally learned to quote a biased article.
But won't you feel that article kind of ashame yourself compared with your previous quote with better quality?
look at the last line , ending of this lamearticle you quoted:
"But I think it's high time that women should accept it without a fuss that - men are brainier! Just like the way men accepted the national study on 'American health and diet attitudes' by Experian Simmons Research, which proved that "women have higher food IQs than men."
You call this objective science paper? Sounds more like a loser male chauvinist rant to me. What's your next evidence your going to use? Astrology prediction? I'm really curious, have you read any kind of research paper and how do they usually end their articles? Do you or anyone even think this is logic unbiased, unemotional scientific article? Well, maybe a male chauvinist version of science research paper written on a Planet of the Apes.
But to respect your labor force and invisible value spend on googling copying and pasting, I give you more scientific and unbiased reply as follows:
1.Truth of Sexes and IQ test
IQ test is simply influenced by environmental factors
Therefore your claiming innate superiority is based on nothing.
"Most IQ tests are constructed so that there are no overall score differences between females and males. Because environmental factors affect brain activity and behavior, where differences are found, it can be difficult for researchers to assess whether or
not the differences are innate. Areas where differences have been found include verbal and mathematical ability."
2. Truth in your so called "men outperformed women in technical IQ test" is:
"Boys do better on tests of technical aptitude (for example, mechanical aptitude tests) than girls. The same is true for adults. A new study published in Perspectives on Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science,
describes a theory explaining how the difference comes about: the root cause is that boys are just more interested in technical things, like taking apart a bike, than girls are.
Aptitude tests are used to predict how well people will do in school and on jobs. These tests focus on particular skills or kinds of specific aptitude, like verbal or technical aptitude. But the last few decades of research have found that what really matters is general intelligence, not specific aptitudes, says Frank Schmidt of the University of Iowa, author of the new paper. "The factors that are measured by the specific aptitude tests independent of the general intelligence component in these tests don't make any contribution to job performance." Smart people, researchers have found, are able to learn the requirements of any job if they are motivated to. And research shows that men and women do not differ, on average, in general intelligence.
Technical aptitude measures are often used as a component of general intelligence measures, so Schmidt wanted to know why women and men score differently on technical aptitude in particular. He analyzed data from the 10 subtest Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, or ASVAB, to look at how men and women differed on the tests, including those on technical aptitude. He found that at all intelligence levels women score lower on technical aptitude than men at that intelligence level.
Also, at all levels of technical aptitude women had higher levels of general intelligence. So if technical aptitude tests are used as part of a measure of general intelligence, women could receive intelligence scores that are too low. That is, technical aptitude tests may be biased indicators of general intelligence for girls and women.
Schmidt presented a theory that posits that this difference stems from sex differences in interest in technical pursuits, which leads people to acquire technical experience, which in turn increases technical aptitude scores. He presented evidence that among men technical experience does lead to better scores on technical aptitude tests. To find out for sure, someone would have to do a long-term study looking at whether early interests develop into later aptitudes, as opposed to the opposite
theory that aptitudes cause interests. If his theory is right, it might be possible to narrow the gap in technical aptitude by getting girls more interested in technical areas. Interest should lead to aptitude. But that may not work, Schmidt says. "The research shows it's very hard to change people's interests," he says. "They're pretty stable and they form pretty early in life."
It's more important, he says, to make sure that the tests used to measure general intelligence aren't using biased indicators. "That is quite possible today. You can either not use technical aptitude tests or you can use them and counterbalance them," he says, with tests that women tend to do better on, like perceptual speed or some verbal tests."
3. This is a little text to educate why all your previous posts and examples don't make sense.
Also explains why all your previous posts were merely useless statements of quoting phenomenon to explain phenomenon.
Is because your only able to see phenomenon in superfacially, you didn't get the logic and therefore unable to explain the reason
See quote below:
"So if women and men have systematically different life experiences and face dissimilar expectations from birth, then we would expect that their brains would become different (even if they are not innately dissimilar), through these different life experiences. Even if neuroscientists see differences in the brains of grown men and women, it does not follow that these differences are innate and unchangeable. For instance, if girls are expected to be more adept at language, and are placed in more situations that require communication with others, it follows that the networks of the brain associated with language could become more efficient in women. Conversely, if boys receive more toy trucks and Lego’s, are given greater encouragement in math and engineering classes, and eventually take more STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) courses, it follows that the sections of the brain associated with mathematics could become more efficient in men."
Now you figure out what is thinking in logic way and you know why your previous examples doesn't make sense?
Go on, call it political correctness or whatsoever can confort your little sensitive boy's fragile heart, and continue be a-----
Or learn what is humor, caricature, and grow with a little perception?