Views: 8866|Replies: 16

Yale World Fellowship Program , Leaders of Tomorrow making chaos in Russia? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-10 13:10:52 |Display all floors
This post was edited by SMITHI at 2011-12-10 13:17

Yale World Fellowship Program 2012 | Leaders of Tomorrow ...


New York Times
Rousing Russia With a Phrase
December 9, 2011

MOSCOW — The man most responsible for the extraordinary burst of antigovernment activism here over the past week will not speak at a rally planned for Saturday, or even attend it, because he is in prison.

Enlarge This Image

Alexander Demianchuk/Reuters

An activist wearing a Vladimir Putin mask showed a magazine with an image of Alexei Navalny, the Russian blogger, during an opposition protest in St. Petersburg on Thursday.



Mikhail Voskresensky/Reuters

Alexei Navalny, a Russian activist, spoke during an opposition protest in Moscow on Monday.
Cut off from the Internet, Russia’s best-known blogger will have to wait until the next morning, when his lawyer will take him a stack of printouts telling him what happened — whether the protest fizzled, exploded into violence or made history. At a final coordinating meeting for the protest on Friday evening, where a roomful of veteran organizers were shouting to make themselves heard, a young environmental activist turned toward the crowd, suddenly grave.
“I’d like to thank Aleksei Navalny,” she said. “Thanks to him, specifically because of the efforts of this concrete person, tomorrow thousands of people will come out to the square. It was he who united us with the idea: all against ‘the Party of Swindlers and Thieves,’ ” the name Mr. Navalny coined to refer to Vladimir V. Putin’s political party, United Russia.
A week ago, Mr. Navalny, 35, was famous mainly within the narrow context of Russia’s blogosphere. But after last Sunday’s parliamentary elections, he channeled accumulated anger over reported violations into street politics, calling out to “nationalists, liberals, leftists, greens, vegetarians, Martians” via his Twitter feed (135,750 followers) and his blog (61,184) to protest.
If Saturday’s protest is as large as its organizers expect — the city has granted a permit for 30,000 — Mr. Navalny will be credited for mobilizing a generation of young Russians through social media, a leap much like the one that spawned Occupy Wall Street and youth uprisings across Europe this year.
The full measure of Mr. Navalny’s charisma became clear after protests on Monday night; an estimated 5,000 people materialized, making it the largest anti-Kremlin demonstration in recent memory, and Mr. Navalny was arrested on charges of resisting the police and sentenced to 15 days in prison.
All that night, as temperatures dipped below freezing, Mr. Navalny’s disciples stood vigil outside the precinct where he was being held, their eyes on their Twitter feeds. Someone had spread a rumor that he was dead, and even his lawyers were unsure of his whereabouts, adding to the sense that Mr. Navalny — who has been reluctant to present himself as a political leader — was at the center of everything that was happening.
“He is the only man who can take all the common hipsters and make them go onto the street,” said Anton Nikolayev, 35, who spent much of Tuesday outside courtrooms hoping to see Mr. Navalny. “He is a figure who could beat Putin if he was allowed.”
This assertion may sound far-fetched. Mr. Putin, now in his 12th year as the paramount leader, has approval ratings of above 60 percent, according to the independent Levada Center. As recently as two weeks ago, Levada found that 60 percent of Russians surveyed were not willing to consider any figure from the anti-Putin opposition as a presidential candidate. Only 1 percent named Mr. Navalny, whose exposure is through Twitter and his blogs, Navalny.ru and Rospil.info.
But the aftermath of last Sunday’s parliamentary elections has shaken political assumptions, largely because the authorities seem unable to regain control of the public discourse. For a decade, Russia’s political agenda has been determined inside the Kremlin, where strategists selected and promulgated themes for public discussion, said Konstantin Remchukov, editor of the daily newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta.
“And now, just a few days after the elections, the political agenda is being determined by other people,” like the longtime opposition leader Boris Y. Nemtsov and Mr. Navalny, he said. “This is shocking, and totally unpredictable.”
MR. NAVALNY has Nordic good looks, a caustic sense of humor and no political organization.
Five years ago, he quit the liberal party Yabloko, frustrated with the liberals’ infighting and isolation from mainstream Russian opinion. Liberals, meanwhile, have deep reservations about him, because he espouses Russian nationalist views. He has appeared as a speaker alongside neo-Nazis and skinheads, and once starred in a video that compares dark-skinned Caucasus militants to cockroaches. While cockroaches can be killed with a slipper, he says that in the case of humans, “I recommend a pistol.”
What attracts people to Mr. Navalny is not ideology, but the confident challenge he mounts to the system. A real estate lawyer by training, he employs data — on his Web sites he documents theft at state-run companies — and relentless, paint-stripping contempt. “Party of Swindlers and Thieves” has made its way into the vernacular with breathtaking speed and severely damaged United Russia’s political brand.
He projects a serene confidence that events are converging, slowly but surely, against the Kremlin.
“Revolution is unavoidable,” he told the Russian edition of Esquire, in an interview published this month. “Simply because the majority of people understand that the system is wrong. When you are in the company of bureaucrats you hear them talking about who has stolen everything, why nothing works and how horrible everything is.”
He was less definitive about the future he envisioned for the country, saying only that he hoped it would “resemble a huge, irrational, metaphysical Canada.”
Mr. Navalny had become less obscure by the end of the week. On Wednesday, the former mayor of Moscow, Yuri M. Luzhkov, said he would consider appearing at a protest if Mr. Navalny invited him. A few hours later, a blindingly profane reference to Mr. Navalny was reposted from President Dmitri A. Medvedev’s Twitter account, prompting his press office to release a statement explaining that the message had been sent out by a member of the technical support staff “during a routine password change.”
On Thursday, United Russia published an attack on Mr. Navalny, describing his activism as “typical dirty self-promotion,” and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton issued a statement about his case. The consulting firm Medialogia documented a sudden leap in the number of mentions of Mr. Navalny in the Russian news media, from several hundred a day to around 3,000. On Friday, people started circulating a Web site promoting him as a candidate in the March presidential election. Mr. Navalny, even skeptics admit, managed to knit together a crowd that had not previously existed.
the week. “No one drove us here in buses, no one paid us anything, but here we are anyway, and we have been here for more than a day.”
“That should tell you something,” he said.

“They had never gathered anywhere together before,” wrote Grigory Tumanov, a reporter for Gazeta.ru. “They just read Twitter, and to them it was clear that in this situation you have to go somewhere, do something, unite around someone, because it was intolerable. Let this be Navalny, with all his pluses and minuses.”

BY his appeals hearing on Wednesday, Mr. Navalny looked tired and disgusted. His supporters had found amateur video showing that he had not resisted arrest, and that the officers who testified against him were not the ones who had arrested him, but the judge refused to review it. A photograph taken from outside the detention center showed him gripping the bars on his window and staring out with a fierce, fixed gaze.

“There are people standing here who were not recruited by anyone,” said Viktor Masyagin, 28, outside a courtroom earlier in

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-10 14:12:19 |Display all floors




Alexei Navalny

He was dubbed "Russia's Erin Brockovich" by Time magazine[2] and named Person of the Year 2009 by Vedomosti.[3] Navalny was a World Fellow at Yale University's "World Fellows Program" aimed at "creating a global network of emerging leaders and to broaden international understanding" in 2010.[4] He graduated from People's Friendship University of Russia in 2003.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexei_Navalny

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-12-10 21:01:06 |Display all floors
Yea you really have to watch those socialistic programmed universities.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-11 01:34:01 |Display all floors
This post was edited by SMITHI at 2011-12-11 01:40
lotusfly7 Post time: 2011-12-10 21:01
Yea you really have to watch those socialistic programmed universities.


Organised crime don't care about socialist or capitalist aspect of it , they care only are you “friend of ours” or not.

Ideology have no meaning in this nonideological times , there is no religion , there is no heaven , there is no santa...................



Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the first US president
to use the phrase “he might be a bastard, but he's our bastard”

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-12-11 12:52:42 |Display all floors
SMITHI Post time: 2011-12-11 01:34
Organised crime don't care about socialist or capitalist aspect of it , they care only are you “f ...

Well actually organized crime does care to a degree, but you are right about them caring more as to who is with who. Organized crime well understands which side of their bread gets buttered the most from. And political parties as well as religious zealots play their roles. Roosevelt was a socialist and helped immensely with forming the unions in their country. Which to this day is well known for being tied to organized crime.

But who cares, after all is it not easier to simply hate them all? No matter who the bas tard belongs too? lotusfly7 said that.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-11 15:36:36 |Display all floors
This post was edited by SMITHI at 2011-12-11 15:38

lotusfly7 Post time: 2011-12-11 12:52

Well actually organized crime does care to a degree, but you are right about them caring more as t ...

Roosevelt was a socialist

Truman said same thing about Samoza ,speaking of brutal Nicaraguan dictator Somoza , Harry  "He's a bastard, but he's our bastard."

Is Truman socialist too , is pope in Vatican socialist too?

I'm not inclined to ridicule your statement  because you do come across as smart one but surely not everybody is socialist.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-12-11 15:44:59 |Display all floors
SMITHI Post time: 2011-12-11 15:36
lotusfly7 Post time: 2011-12-11 12:52
Well actually organized crime does care to a degree, but you ...

No not everyone is socialist. Thanks for the compliment, but we can always agree to disagree, no problem. Truman was a progressive liberal with socialist tendencies, yes. I could give a crap about the Pope or their followers of flunkies, except there is some influence there. Socialist? More like pedophilia incubation.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.