Views: 7684|Replies: 2

India all-party talks fails to end retail deadlock [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-11-29 19:03:13 |Display all floors

An all-party meeting in India has failed to break a deadlock over opposition demands to reverse a decision to open up the retail market to global supermarket chains.

        On Thursday, the cabinet agreed to allow 51% foreign ownership of multi-brand retail stores. It is an executive decision and does not need a vote.

        But opposition politicians say the move will damage India's small retailers.
        And parliament has been in uproar, adjourned repeatedly over the issue.

        A leader of one of the opposition parties, Satish Mishra, told reporters after Tuesday's meeting that the government had asked for more time "to think on the issue".

        Opposition politicians said at the meeting that they would not allow parliament to function until the government rescinded the decision.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-11-29 19:03:39 |Display all floors
But the Congress-led coalition government says that retail reform will create tens of millions of jobs.

By allowing for 51% foreign direct ownership (FDI) of multi-brand retail stores, groups like Tesco and Wal-Mart can open stores. Such operators can currently only sell wholesale in India and not directly to customers.

Earlier Commerce Minister Anand Sharma wrote a letter to the political leaders saying the absence of proper supply chain, cold storage infrastructure and logistics were hurting Indian farmers and that foreign investment in retail will help solve those issues.

"As a result, on the one hand farmers are unable to secure remunerative price for their produce, while consumers end up paying more than five times the price secured by the farmers," Mr Sharma said, adding that compexities in the distribution chain had an impact on prices as well.

The government has also agreed to raise the cap on foreign investment in single-brand retailing to 100%, from its current 51% limit.

Despite assurances from the government , there have been widespread protests against it.

The chief ministers of four major states have openly voiced their opposition, saying any such move will hurt businesses.

"I oppose it tooth and nail... it is not the right step as it will ruin the retailers and will lead to a point of unemployment beyond imagination in the country," said Nitish Kumar, the chief minister of Bihar.

At the same time, traders in various cities have also staged protests against the decision.

The growing discontent has forced some prospective investors to adopt a wait-and-watch policy.

"We are waiting for clarification of the rules related to FDI," said Jean-Noel Bironneau, managing director of Carrefour India. "We prefer to assess the situation."

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-11-29 19:06:22 |Display all floors
I completely agree with India opening up its 450 billion US$ worth retail industry. Allowing 100% FDI will decrease the inflation, it increases perishable goods delivery and storage efficiency. Currently many vegetables in India perish before they arrive to the consumers. Third, the retail traders never pay government taxes and yet manipulate the price of essential goods increasing inflation. Fourth, I would seriously love having Wal Mart in my city

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.