Author: dragon8

Is the death penalty for murderers a good law or a bad law? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-7-12 12:18:14 |Display all floors
Originally posted by seneca at 2011-7-12 10:50



So is that YOUR own explanation why you are so fundamentalist, coarse, heartless, inconsiderate and self-centred?


.
55 billion dollars for jail alone in America, not including other cost.

Which means lot of criminals, which means lot of innocent people have been suffering.

I guess that is too hard for a pea brain like you to understand.

Now, on behalf of those who have been suffering, F u c k  you.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-7-12 13:07:53 |Display all floors
The world will only be a good place when all the good people have killed all the bad ones.

No irony in this?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-7-12 13:09:46 |Display all floors
Originally posted by Chegsyboy at 2011-7-12 13:07
The world will only be a good place when all the good people have killed all the bad ones.

No irony in this?


.

There is no clear cut on good vs bad.

A guy maybe a great scientist, but not a good husband or father.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-7-12 13:12:56 |Display all floors
Originally posted by ztoa789 at 2011-7-12 13:09


.

There is no clear cut on good vs bad.

A guy maybe a great scientist, but not a good husband or father.


Of course there is, according to this thread, you are good if you want to kill killers, but killers are bad, nkay?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-7-12 13:16:12 |Display all floors
Originally posted by Chegsyboy at 2011-7-12 13:12


Of course there is, according to this thread, you are good if you want to kill killers, but killers are bad, nkay?



Killers are not necessary bad.

Churchill killed 1000 french soldiers, he was a good guy and britain was lucky to have a leader like him who had the gut to take the responsibility. (thank god, there werent many seneca s in Britain at that time.)

[ Last edited by ztoa789 at 2011-7-12 01:33 PM ]

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-7-12 13:24:04 |Display all floors
In a perfect world, "Should" or "Shouldnt" are compatible with "How". (like in a wealth society whose government has infinite money.)

We are not living in a perfect world, so dont try to use a list of rules on paper to rule everything.

For example, it is against common sense that superior count in US ruled that banning violate games for children is against constitution.

Another example, an american church burn Koran, and put it on facebook,  which put oversea american soldiers in great danger and dozens of people killled because of that.

[ Last edited by ztoa789 at 2011-7-12 01:31 PM ]

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2011-7-12 13:47:36 |Display all floors
I'm not claiming it's a perfect world. I am a big boy and know that the randomness and craziness of the world will always ensure instability, but if we can all be a bit more peaceful and not be ruled by mindless bloodlust, it will be a little more acceptable.

Calling for murder in the name of the law is no better than murdering. Same mentality. Murder is acceptable to both, therefore both are equally "good" or "bad" depending on which side of the fence you position yourself.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.