Views: 11253|Replies: 103

Colour Revolutions and Jasmine ........... [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Medal Medal of honor Gold Medal July's Best Writer 2012 October's Best Writer 2012

Post time 2011-3-1 13:29:00 |Display all floors
This article will be posted in six parts ...........

Thursday, February 3, 2011
Templating a Color Revolution

UPDATE: The below mentioned "Prachatai" website, a self-proclaimed NGO working in opposition to the Thai government on behalf of the "red shirt" color revolution has been revealed to receive partial funding from the notorious globalist funding arm the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). NED includes a myriad of globalists on the Council on Foreign Relations, Rand, and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, including "neo-cons" Vin Weber and Francis Fukuyama (also a RAND trustee) as board members.

By Tony Cartalucci

Introduction

My first exposure to globalist engineered color revolutions began in Thailand during the spring of 2009. Since then, it has taken me nearly 2 years to unravel, decipher, and expose the mechanics of a staged revolution, an opportunity afforded to me only through the desperate gambit twice thus far failing and dragging on. As instability spreads across the Middle East and threatens to spread beyond in an unprecedented and simultaneous conflagration of the world's remaining old-world regimes, we do not have 2 years to unravel and expose the inner workings of each.

However, the premise being that a central globalist agenda drives these uprisings and uses the same or similar organizations to bring them about, using the color revolution in Thailand as a template, we can quickly analyze and expose each revolution as it unfolds and possibly balk the globalist agenda that hinges on their desired and orchestrated regime changes.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Medal Medal of honor Gold Medal July's Best Writer 2012 October's Best Writer 2012

Post time 2011-3-1 14:39:22 |Display all floors

Part Two .........

The Rabble-Rousers

It is essential to first examine who is behind the protesters, what their connections are, and what their demands are. A movement unable to enumerate their grievances and who instead insist on rhetoric like "democratization," "social justice," and "elections" should immediately raise suspicions. Double your suspicions if it turns out a globalist backed opposition political party is leading the protesters. It then becomes obvious that the goal is not "democratization" or "elections" in and of themselves, but merely the installation of a globalist favored party into power.

In Thailand the "red shirt" protesters are unable to articulate their grievances beyond rhetorical "double standards" and alleged stolen elections. The fact that a political party, Peua Thai Party, leads the protests on the stage to supplement their attempts to regain power in Parliament point to a more self-serving agenda.

Concrete demands would be "improved education," "better infrastructure," "lower taxes," "a less intrusive government," and so on. Political activity in the US carried out by alternative media activism usually revolves around specific, enumerated grievances and specific redresses, not necessarily "regime change." A movement without "a program," myopically obsessed with "regime change" smacks of geopolitical meddling.

Further examination of Thailand's situation, reveals that the Peua Thai Party leading the "red shirts" on stage is in turn led by deposed Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Thaksin was literally standing in front of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City on the eve the Thai military ousted his government from power in a bloodless coup in 2006. Thaksin had been consolidating power, dismantling checks and balances, and systematically attempting to "liberalize" Thailand's economy on behalf of globalist foreign investors. Before taking office in 2001, Thaksin had been serving as an adviser for the notorious globalist equity firm, the Carlyle Group.

His ouster from power was coupled by a protectionist posture taken by the Thai establishment, perhaps wise to what was unfolding. The globalist response was to begin working on a color revolution to permanently overthrow the Thai establishment and reinstall Thaksin as head of a socialist welfare state. Thus, when a "revolutionary" leader has direct links to and support from globalist institutions, it serves as yet more evidence of geopolitical meddling.

No example is as clear as the current unrest in Egypt, and the self-proclaimed leader of the protesters, globalist stooge Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Crisis Group. With ElBaradei's year long efforts to build up his "National Front for Change" and the Muslim Brotherhood's support, we see yet another group of protesters calling not for concrete demands, but myopically obsessed on regime change.

Summary: Examine the opposition; are they articulating concrete, articulated grievances and demands or are they myopically obsessed with "regime change" and rhetoric? Establish their leadership and their support, and thus their motive. If their leader is an overt globalist, geopolitical meddling is afoot.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-3-1 15:05:17 |Display all floors
capitalist, by definition ,  will do  every thing in their power to break up and defeat revolutionaries.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-3-1 15:09:47 |Display all floors
it is not up to globalist or reporters or CIA or anyone to decide where and how there will be revolutionaries.

revolutions that are good have the follower characteristics:

- they come from the left
-they come from the bottom
- driven by the people
-not directed by the capitalists


revolutions can succeed only where the terrain is suitable for revolution

[ Last edited by Revolutionar at 2011-3-1 03:11 PM ]

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-3-1 15:15:43 |Display all floors
the forces of revolutions vs the forces of stability and status quo.


not all revolutions can succeed. If you look at the inequality of the two forces, the chances for success is actually quite low and so revolutionaries have to choose their  battles carefully.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2011-3-1 15:17:00 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-3-1 15:19:56 |Display all floors

Reply #6 Wahahaha's post

but the truth is that is the Arab 2011 revolution has succeeded beyond anyone's expectations.


and so has brought back much pride as an Arab.

now, the Arabs can stand taller in the world compared to just a few months ago.

[ Last edited by Revolutionar at 2011-3-1 03:21 PM ]

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.