Views: 12413|Replies: 53

Shenzhen company 'sorry' for Barrier Reef spillage [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2010-4-9 16:33:59 |Display all floors
australian media is attacking china on this issue. china and australia is experiencing a relatively tough period after the rio tinto issue. it seems that australia sill cannot forget china over the issue and found another chance to criticize china. it's sure the chinese ship's fault to pollute barrier reef, but don't highlight it with other irrelative issues, such as comparing the ship with a time bomb on the sea.

south china morning post

The Shenzhen owners of a ship that ran aground on the Great Barrier Reef causing an environmental crisis admitted on Friday that the vessel was off course and apologised for the accident.

The owners broke their silence as Australian authorities began pumping nearly 1,000 tonnes of fuel from the coal carrier that hit a coral reef a week ago to prevent it spilling more oil in the world heritage area.

Shenzhen Energy Transport, which owns the stricken Shen Neng 1, said it was “sorry for the accident”, which it said happened after the ship failed to turn as planned as it sailed from the Australian port of Gladstone to China.

"The vessel did not alter course to the east to go through the passage as planned, and as a consequence the vessel ran aground on Douglas Shoal,” said Hu Wei, Shenzhen Energy Transport’s chief of shipping and development.

"We appreciate the environmental and economic significance of the Great Barrier Reef,” he said after the ship leaked about three tonnes of fuel oil, creating a slick three kilometres long.

"We are fully committed to cooperating with and assisting the authorities to minimise any environmental damage and to ensure the matter is resolved safely and quickly,” Hu said in a statement.

The captain of the ship, that was carrying 68,000 tonnes of coal, provoked anger in Australia earlier this week by claiming the oil spill caused when it hit the shoal was not serious.

But his bosses on Friday vowed to work closely with investigators and maritime authorities, as the Australian Federal Police confirmed the case had been referred to the force for a possible criminal investigation.

Beijing was paying close attention to the incident and was concerned about possible pollution to the Great Barrier Reef, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Jiang Yu told a press briefing.

Maritime officials on Friday began the fraught operation of pumping the remaining 950 tonnes of fuel oil off the ship ahead of attempts to dislodge it from the shoal in the world famous marine park.

Booms were set up around the ship to catch any additional oil that may spill while fuel is being transferred and wildlife experts were on standby to rush to the rescue of any marine creatures caught in a slick.

"This is a delicate operation that will take days, not hours,” said Patrick Quirk of Maritime Safety Queensland, which is overseeing the salvage attempt off the coast of the eastern Australian state.

Fuel will be pumped on to a 50-metre barge, which can carry up to 1,500 tonnes of oil.

Chemical dispersants were used to break up the initial spill and tugboats have been sent to hold the ship steady and stop it grinding across the reef.

Officials said the risks of the ship breaking up were decreasing and the salvors had placed monitoring equipment on the hull which showed it was holding together.

But Prime Minister Kevin Rudd warned that the removal of oil would be a complex operation and the crisis had not yet passed.

"This is going to take a lot of time, a lot of technical precision and hard work and it’s a very difficult situation still with no absolute guarantee of success,” he told reporters.

China is Australia’s top trading partner.
I am a Beijing girl.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2010-4-9 16:59:03 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2010-4-9 17:13:59 |Display all floors
Originally posted by Wahahaha at 2010-4-9 16:59
It appears that the oil can be effectively contained. There really is no point blowing the issue out of proportions.  Afterall, it WAS an accident and the poor guy has apologized, no?

When these other issues arose, the regulars on these boards went absolutely nuts in their allegations, unrelated insults and racial slurs.

When a Chinese company apologizes, these same people insist that the Australians should not blow it out of proportion as it was just an 'accident'.

"Poor guy"

It was an accident borne out of incompetent & criminal behavior for which the captain (and in turn the company) should be held responsible. It was the captain's deliberate intention to move off course, into a protected area, to save time & money.

Would you have described the captain as "poor guy" had he been white and the situation had happened off China's coast?

I doubt it.

Unlike Walollollol, it is good to see that the Chinese government is taking an open and conciliatory stance in dealing with this issue. I am sure it will be sorted out quickly and quietly (in a diplomatic sense).

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-4-9 17:15:08 |Display all floors
Compared to Rio Tinto Big time Fruad, the above is smal as is an accident la
What's on your mind now........ooooooooooooooo la la....Kind Regards

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2010-4-9 17:20:17 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2010-4-9 17:40:29 |Display all floors
Originally posted by Wahahaha at 2010-4-9 17:20
Have we forgotten the golden rule of "Innocent until proven guilty"?

Asks exactly the right person.
您买象牙 - 您杀了大象! - “用现代文明标准比划中国人,是严重的种族歧视行为。”
„Ich ficke wo, wen, und wann ich will, hast du mich verstanden. Auch du könntest ficken, aber du kannst es ja gar nicht, deine deutsche Genauigkeit... verbietet es dir“. Jean-Claude Juncker

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2010-4-9 17:49:04 |Display all floors
Originally posted by Wahahaha at 2010-4-9 17:20
"Innocent until proven guilty"?..

Now that's just not polite. Please control your language. Soon it might offend me

The above statement has never stopped you from declaring guilt in all kinds of circumstances relating to whites & anglos - especially when these accusations are made in government controlled newspapers in China without any evidence offered.

However, I digress.

Originally posted by Wahahaha at 2010-4-9 17:20
Can you provide an evidence to support your accusation/judgement?   ...

In this case, the company has admitted:
1) They were wrong
2) The ship was off course
3) The ship should have turned but didn't (when taking an illegal shortcut)

In addition,  Xin hua stated that the ship took this wrong course to save time & money.

The company has admitted it's guilt.

And yet you ask for evidence?

Are you blind as well as a terrible speller? (FCUKFACE?!?)

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.