Author: buddy35

9/11 -- Did it happen the way the Anglos said it did?    Close [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-12 18:41:14 |Display all floors
emucentral Post time: 2011-12-12 18:26
Good-o,

Did your scale model coke can include supporting ribs, flooring, cargo, seats, passengers ...

Answered

I have answered these stupid questions many times before.You obviously want to have the debate bogged down to preventus from moving on to other related topics.Senior Aerospace Engineer Joseph Keith and I use the coke can analogy to illustrate a point.I have measured the actual buckling load on coke cans to validate Timoshenko's well known 1908 formula for the thin shell buckling of cylindrical shells.I am as far as I know the only individual on the planet to have applied this formula to the B767 fuselage and arrived at the buckling load of 127 tons.This load includes a factor taken from published charts for the reinforcing effect of the longitudinal stringers.On the other hand I have not considered rivet holes,windows and other discontinuities that would lower the buckling load considerably.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-12 18:48:15 |Display all floors
Point loads

Seats and baggage containers are point loads and do not contribute to the rigidity of the fuselage.As the buckling progressed these objects would coagulate and increase the load the fuselage could take.However this would be accompanied by the accordioning of the fuselage,huge tears and the ejection of seats,passengers,baggage containers and other such objects.These would have fallen hundreds of feet along with large wing sections,huge quantities of fuel and the tail on to Liberty Street.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-12 18:51:49 |Display all floors
Speeds

The speed of an object does not increase it's structural rigidity.Birdbrain being a low level propagandist has no knowledge of Newton's third law.The speed of 260 metres per second as I have repeatedly poined out is impossible for any high bypass turbofan driven airliner close to the ground.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2011-12-12 18:56:40 |Display all floors
Fake

The absence of wings,tail sections,passenger corpses strapped to their seats,flaming pools of fuel and innumerable other airliner related objects on Liberty Street is sufficient proof the videos were fake and that there were no planes.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

anonymoustext
anonymoustext  Post time 2011-12-12 19:10:37
This post was edited by Anonymous at 2015-2-11 02:59

Deleted.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2011-12-12 19:20:18 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked
Disclaimer: Thoughtful responses will be enjoyed & in some cases, elicit a
response. All others from trolls,
conspiracy nuts and the willfully ignorant will be ignored. Thank you.

Use magic tools Report

anonymoustext
anonymoustext  Post time 2011-12-12 19:20:42
This post was edited by Anonymous at 2015-2-11 02:58

Deleted.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.