- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 25729 Hour
- Reading permission
Skull trepination needed?
Originally posted by tripitaka at 2007-11-9 16:49
To understand why China gets criticised you need to understand that human rights is big business in western countries. If a “refugee” gets into the country, they need to be assessed, and given a ...
Thanks for your precious observation here.
Yes, the five Anglo nations are all alike in their approaches to China and their intelligence services share information amongst themselves.
The disinformation attacks against China do not reflect their strength, but rather their fear -- fear of the Chinese onslaught in economic terms, because they know in their hearts that their culture, which thrived on officially sanctioned piracy (in the form of their navy) and which touts power politics -- could never truly match Chinese wits and industry in the long run under the new rules of engagement. A cursory look at the artifacts in their museum will explain why.
It is the same fear as the kind experienced by a rapist when the victim's brother Jet Li knocks on the door at 3 a.m. They know they are doomed because China's way -- the peaceful way -- is more potent than one touting the use of brute force. That's why Robert Gates, the U.S. Defense Secretary, wants his soldiers to study at China's military academies.
Nobody has ever successfully dislodged these Anglos from their high pedestal of power -- exerting global influence with the self-assured confidence that had grown with it since the days of the Spanish Armada in 1588.
Not the Spaniards, not the French, not the Dutch, not the Nordics, not the Germans, not the Russians, not the Ottomans, and certainly not the Arabs, could dethrone them, so to speak. They weren't the first West European colonizers, but certainly would be the last. They didn't leave Hongkong in the way they left other colonies -- peacefully and with face saved. China's subtle way of negotiating from a position of strength is what they fear most.
These Anglos, together with the French, burned the Yuan Ming Yuan in Beijing in 1860. The one who gave the orders to burn the priceless imperial compound was "Lord" Elgin -- they had always given titles like "Sir" or "Lord" to their meanest official pirates The pity is that we can never burn any of their stuff in return -- they have nothing of their own to speak of at the London Museum. Nearly everything had been stolen from others -- Indians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and of course the Chinese.
The Chinese government is trying not to give them a handle to field unnecessary complaints against us, and is unflinchingly looking straight ahead towards its own goals. But they still constantly come up with new issues to hound us -- environment, Dalai Lama, human rights, transparency, toys, anything they can grab on their way out of the focal point of history.
Through diplomacy and trade, we have already won Asia, Africa and Latin America over to our side, and we have befriended Russia at her nadir of fortune after its breakup. We have demonstrated our goodwill with the majority of the world's nations, and we have warned the Americans over Taidu's danger of inciting an unwanted confrontation between us.
Haven't you noticed that China was the only major country which treated Russia with respect after its disintegration, reminding the Russians of their good deeds and ignoring their bad behavior?
The Anglo nations, in contrast, kept bullying Russia -- in essence treating it as a defeated nation.
Their methodology is determined by the nature of Anglo culture and traditions, and they just can't help behaving in a condescending way towards the Russians, not because they aren't capable of treating their Slavic enemies better, but that they don't know a better way.
So it's the Anglos and their handful of friends versus the rest.
They want the rest of the world to think that they are "color-blind", and that they are concerned with the death toll of colored kids displaced by the war in the Darfur region, as if they truly care about the welfare of the people in their former colonies.
But reality tells a different story.
Haven't you noticed that in the James Bond movies, which actually accurately reflect how the Anglos view themselves, Agent 007 sleeps with women of all colors and races, while they themselves would not hesitate in killing one of their own females -- Princess Diana -- as soon as they learned that she was impregnated by Dodi's son.
The obvious question is -- James Bond could sleep with all those adoring females from all corners of the world, and they tout that as evidence of their broad-mindedness, how come Dodi wasn't allowed to impregnate Diana?
Anyone who believes that these folks aren't hypocritical barbarians in the truest sense of the word should undergo skull trepination by a voodoo practitioner.