- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 0 Hour
- Reading permission
lower degree=high ability?
Originally posted by verona at 2007-2-8 08:47
University is necessary. The first three years is the transitional area between total student life and half student life,and the last year is society rehearsal.
i see what your point and to some extent i agree with you. however, what's the conclusion you want to draw from the equation?
it is absolute true that not all undergraduates are best and have got high abilities in university, however, can you deny that most of them gained some abilities? you want the university to create underduates that are all qualified for the society, however, i believe that is impossible.
to some extent, university could be compared to be a factory that produce human resourses. we have see a lot of factory that produce excellent product, like haier, ge, however, they too have some products that are unqualified to the requirements. it's completely impssible for a factory to produce all qualifed products.
a factory, like haier, mr. zhang ruimin may destroy those unqualifed products. what the university could do to those unqualifed students? to re-educate them? they past the age and they are supposed to step out of the college and create whatever they could for the society, the only differences between them may be the quantity of the value they created. the universtity could not crush their graduates, however bad they may be. they process for 3 or 4 years, and whatever the product maybe, they have to be sold.
that is a problem, what i want to do is to create a proper attitude to the career of creating useful haman for society, instead of wanting the university to produce all qualified students, since that is impossible in human society.