Author: ptbptb

关于 eye hospital 的讨论,回应诸位感兴趣的教授 [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2006-9-11 13:32:53 |Display all floors

在这些根本算不上“学术”的是非问题上,根本不存在什么“百家争鸣百花齐放”,

可以说,prof buaawj 的失误就在于把简单的问题“提高”到“学术研究”,模糊了是非的界线。

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2006-9-11 17:32:53 |Display all floors

Reply #42 ptbptb's post

其他的错误内容仍然在网页上,一点都没有修改。
http://www.bisu.edu.cn/e-signs/news_view.asp?id=12

Use magic tools Report

rovi297 has been deleted
Post time 2006-9-14 11:14:33 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2006-9-14 17:13:31 |Display all floors
Originally posted by buaawj at 2006-9-11 12:26
学术研究在绝大多数时候都很难是一锤定音的事情,尤其是社会科学方面的探索与研究,只能是大家发表一定的独到见解,有不同看法者则可以进行进一步的交流与探索,此所谓百家争鸣百花齐放。
有人提出“有任何人“全面的,彻底的知道了解翻译的‘学’与‘术’”吗? 如果有,请指出。如果没有,你这个问题就毫无意义。”那么是否有任何人发表的意见一锤定音,无懈可击!!!  


怎么“一锤定音”?是依靠行政手段锁人帖子逼人删改批评?还是滚钉板耍无赖,生拉硬扯不知所云还要再加惊叹号?

在chinglish论坛首发批评e-signs流毒甚广的“独到见解”,难道不是“新事物”,不是学术,不是争鸣?

是谁“首创”责问别人懂不懂‘学’与‘术’? 此人不会认为“倒打一耙”也是“学术”伎俩吧?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2006-9-14 19:19:18 |Display all floors

Reply #46 nyleda's post

如果以某网友的口吻来进行学术探讨,那么学术界岂非要天下大乱???

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2006-9-14 19:42:48 |Display all floors

Reply #47 buaawj's post

是谁“首创”责问别人懂不懂‘学’与‘术’? 此人不会认为“倒打一耙”也是“学术”伎俩吧?

Use magic tools Report

rovi297 has been deleted
Post time 2006-9-14 19:50:12 |Display all floors

请buaawj “大教授”正面回答nyleda的提问!

Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.