Views: 5355|Replies: 9

Force feeding detainees at Guantanomo Bay, Cuba. [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2006-2-22 20:11:31 |Display all floors
All in a day's work as the world's only military superpower.

February 22, 2006

Force-Feeding at Guantánamo Is Now Acknowledged


WASHINGTON, Feb. 21 — The military commander responsible for the American detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, confirmed Tuesday that officials there last month turned to more aggressive methods to deter prisoners who were carrying out long-term hunger strikes to protest their incarceration.

The commander, Gen. Bantz J. Craddock, head of the United States Southern Command, said soldiers at Guantánamo began strapping some of the detainees into "restraint chairs" to force-feed them and isolate them from one another after finding that some were deliberately vomiting or siphoning out the liquid they had been fed.

"It was causing problems because some of these hard-core guys were getting worse," General Craddock said at a breakfast meeting with reporters. Explaining the use of the restraint chairs, he added, "The way around that is you have to make sure that purging doesn't happen."

After The New York Times reported Feb. 9 that the military had begun using restraint chairs and other harsh methods, military spokesmen insisted that the procedures for dealing with the hunger strikes at Guantánamo had not changed. They also said they could not confirm that the chairs had been used.

On Tuesday, General Craddock said he had reviewed the use of the restraint chairs, as had senior officials at the Department of Defense, and they concluded that the practice was "not inhumane." General Craddock left no doubt, however, that commanders had decided to try to make life less comfortable for the hunger strikers, and that the measures were seen as successful.

"Pretty soon it wasn't convenient, and they decided it wasn't worth it," he said of the hunger strikers. "A lot of the detainees said: 'I don't want to put up with this. This is too much of a hassle.' "

A spokesman for the Southern Command, Lt. Col. James Marshall, said that restraint chairs had been used in the feeding of 35 of the detainees so far, and that 3 were still being fed that way. He said the number of prisoners refusing to eat had fallen from 41 on Dec. 15 — when the restraint chairs were first used on a trial basis — to 5, according to a military spokesman.

Military officials have said the tough measures were necessary to keep detainees from dying. But while many of the strikers lost between 15 and 20 percent of their normal body weight, only a few were thought to be in immediate medical danger, two officers familiar with the strike said.

Lawyers for the detainees and several human rights groups have assailed the new methods used against the hunger strikers as inhumane, and as unjustified by the reported medical condition of the prisoners.

According to newly declassified interview notes, several detainees who had been on hunger strikes told their lawyers during visits late last month that the military had begun using harsher methods more widely in the second week of January. One Yemeni detainee, Emad Hassan, described the chair to lawyers in interviews on Jan. 24 and 25.

"The head is immobilized by a strap so it can't be moved, their hands are cuffed to the chair and the legs are shackled," the notes quote Mr. Hassan as saying. "They ask, 'Are you going to eat or not?' and if not, they insert the tube. People have been urinating and defecating on themselves in these feedings and vomiting and bleeding. They ask to be allowed to go to the bathroom, but they will not let them go. They have sometimes put diapers on them."

Another former hunger striker, Isa al-Murbati of Bahrain, described a similar experience to his lawyer, Joshua Colangelo-Bryan, in an interview on Jan. 28.

On Jan. 10, he said, a lieutenant came to his isolation cell and told him that if he did not agree to eat solid food, he would be strapped into the chair and force-fed. After he refused to comply, he said, soldiers picked him up by the throat, threw him to the floor and strapped him to the restraint chair.

Like Mr. Hassan, Mr. Murbati said he had been fed two large bags of liquid formula, which were forced into his stomach very quickly. "He felt pain like a 'knife in the stomach' " Mr. Colangelo-Bryan said.

Detainees said the Guantánamo medical staff also began inserting and removing the long plastic feeding tubes that were threaded through the detainees' nasal passages and into their stomachs at every feeding, a practice that caused sharp pain and frequent bleeding, they said. Until then, doctors there said, they had been allowing the hunger strikers to leave their feeding tubes in, to reduce discomfort.

Military spokesmen have generally discounted the complaints, saying the prisoners are for the most part terrorists, trained by Al Qaeda to use false stories as propaganda.

In a letter to a British physician and human rights activist, Dr. David J. Nicholl, on Dec. 12, the former chief medical officer at Guantánamo, Capt. John S. Edmondson of the Navy, wrote that his staff was not force-feeding any detainees but "providing nutritional supplementation on a voluntary basis to detainees who wish to protest their confinement by not taking oral nourishment."

General Craddock suggested that the medical staff had indulged the hunger strikers to the point that they had been allowed to choose the color of their feeding tubes.

Two other Defense Department officials said a decision had been made to try to break the hunger strikes because they were having a disruptive effect and causing stress for the medical staff.

That effort was stepped up, one official said, in January, when Captain Edmondson left Guantánamo for a new post after receiving a Legion of Merit Medal for "inspiring leadership and exemplary performance."

Eric Schmitt reported from Washington for this article, and Tim Golden from New York.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2006-2-23 03:16:17 |Display all floors
Gotta love the good folks at the NY times.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2006-2-23 07:37:22 |Display all floors

Another day anothe faus pas.

So what else is new ? While we are being lectured to and regaled with happy stories of how wonderful reconstruction is going on in Iraq and how the Iraqis are enjoying the fruits of democracy, liberty and justice, such party pooping news leak out . Naughty corner for the journalists from the NYTimes! What is not naughty is that there are still out there those brave and principled ordinary Americans who dare and care to put these unsavoury items out there for the world to see. Where are thou , the American reputation ?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2006-2-23 12:33:01 |Display all floors
Gnarly, just too gnarly for words.

Abu Ghraib was an outrage, but this stuff at Gitmo is repulsive.  Sickens me to read the details of what our war on terror has done to America and Americans.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2006-2-26 08:55:32 |Display all floors

US & UK Are the Worst Despite Propaganda

Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2006-3-1 17:27:22 |Display all floors
International law regarding POWs is very simple to remember.

even Straus admits that "in the immediate heat of battle GIs were less likely to have international law at the forefront of their thoughts"

It's very simple to remember and follow international law about treatment of POWs.  If it seems like abuse or torture, then don't do it.   That's not so difficult to remember, is it?

Of course, since the White House issued a memorandum that confused things up very badly, enlisted soldiers lost their ability to "go with their gut" on avoiding mistreatment.  Since the White House considers "major organ failure" to be torture, then anything short of that is permissible.  If an enlisted soldier is not permitted to use common sense, then how can he or she apply legal sense with only a high school education?  Should these soldiers refer every order received to their criminal defense attorneys to determine if it is a legal order that has not been altered according to White House interpretation during the night?

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2006-3-2 00:29:38 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.