Author: wchao37

Whither Japan: at crossroads on V-60 Day. [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 1

Post time 2005-9-5 08:28:54 |Display all floors

what would solve the problem?

I have no time for Japanese nationalists, who are sadly increasing in number.  However I also do not understand how easily Chinese people forget the attrocities committed by Chinese against Chinese.

As a foreigner in Japan it seems the stronger the anti-Japan protests in China, the more support the Japanese right wing receive.

What  exactly do Chinese people want?  (This is a very serious question.) I imagine.

- Ending of visits to Yasukuni.
- Bans on government support of right wing text books.
  (Personally I think it is important to study the right wing point of view too,
  so as that  nationalists can be discredited more easily.)
-  Surrendering claims to Diaoyu/Senkaku Is.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2005-9-5 17:13:09 |Display all floors


A written apology will do.  

Speech-action match is very important.

Your questions are very incisive and have been answered by the post.

Please re-read.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2005-9-5 18:10:02 |Display all floors

Can't agree with you more, wchao37

I recommended your V-60 post to many of my friends.


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2005-9-8 11:10:23 |Display all floors

Why haven't you posted this article to People's Daily?

Keep up your good work.

Don't let flies bother you.

No one can bring you down despite all the nasty dishonest attacks from the zionist and Japanese apologist.

They are clowns.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2005-9-11 15:11:44 |Display all floors

Re: Whither Japan: at crossroads on V-60 Day.


>As a victor nation which had suffered the most and contributed
>the greatest towards the eventual defeat of the Japanese, this
> was of course a ludicrous situation for post-war China.

I personally don't have any problem with China portraying herself a victor nation, if that's how she wishes to view herself. But, to be honest, my impressioin upon the way how the Japanese understand it is that they feel China was saved by the U.S. rather than saved herself on her own. In fact, there must be many Japanese who are wondering why they rarely see China expressing her gratitude and appreciation to Americans for coming to rescue China and to the U.S. military for defeating Japan.

>If their recent activities can be taken as a guide, it is
>almost certain that they are pondering on how to avoid making
> the same mistakes in their next war against China.

As far as I know, the Second Sino-Japanese War has never been regarded by the public as a main story to be told in the Japanese history. It has always been a side story, more like a context to the Pacific war, the main story, between the U.S. and Japan. When they discuss strategic issues amongst people who are interested in military affairs, reviewing how the war could have been fought differently, they are usually talking about naval, air, and land battles with Americans, not with the Chinese.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2005-9-12 08:56:04 |Display all floors

2 cents

1) What you said about Japanese textbooks is a proof that Japan is white whashing its people about WW II.

The Cold-war ideology has also played a role such that the west would allow Japan to distort history.

2) The fact is WW II is victory of a UNITED ANTI-FASCIST FRONT. China is winner, as a result, China is one of the 5 nations in permenant UN security Council, even if China had less poewer.

No single country can win the war without its allies.

US together with other allied countries helped China, China helped them too. China resisted Japanese aggression for more than 8 years before US joined in. It greatly bogged down the Japanese troops otherwise it could have been deployed to Russia or Pacific.

Wihtout China and Soviet's huge sacrifice there won't be D-Day, won't be WW II victory, just like without US there won't be final Japanese defeat.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2005-9-13 09:28:16 |Display all floors

It was the Soviet and Chinese sacrifice that made victory possible

We must not forget how World War II was won. WW II victory was a victory of the united anti-fascim front including the Soviet and Chinese.

Richard Overy: It was the Soviet and Chinese sacrifice that made victory possible

Saturday May 7, 2005
The Guardian

Imagine for a moment that around half the population of Great Britain - men, women and children - died in the second world war. What kind of extraordinary trauma would this represent? How would "victory" in 1945 now be viewed, or even celebrated? Yet 27 million is the estimate of Soviet deaths by the end of the war. Actual British losses represented around 0.6% of the population; American losses were smaller, around 0.3%. But Soviet losses, from war, starvation and repression, represented about 14% of the pre-war population.

These losses were the brutal product of German invasion in 1941 and the Soviet determination to resist that aggression and expel the Germans from their territory. The scarcely credible level of sacrifice exposes just how vast and savage the war on the eastern front was. It was here that the great majority of German casualties occurred. It was here that the war was won or lost, for if the Red Army had not succeeded against all the odds in halting the Germans in 1941 and then inflicting the first major defeats at Stalingrad and Kursk in 1943, it is difficult to see how the western democracies, Britain and the US, could have expelled Germany from its new empire.

By 1945 the material strength of the allies was, of course, overwhelming. The critical point came in the middle years of the war, with the Soviet Union teetering before Stalingrad, Rommel poised to take Egypt, the battle of the Atlantic not yet won and American rearmament in its early stages. Victory was not automatic. Soviet resistance meant the difference. Uncertainly, sometimes incompetently, the Soviet armed forces learned the lessons imposed on them by Germany's panzer armies in 1941. A hasty, improvised set of reforms and an economy geared almost exclusively to armaments turned the feeble efforts of 1941 into the vast setpiece battles from the summer of 1943, every one of which the Soviet side won.

German forces were defeated not by the sheer numbers (by 1943 millions of Soviet soldiers were dead or captive and the Red Army was desperate for men), but by the inventive tactics and sturdy technology of their enemy. If this had not been the case, Hitler's armies would have gone on winning, and a huge German-dominated economic empire in Eurasia would have confronted the western allies with a strategic nightmare.

Of course, it is now argued in the west that Soviet victory left a sour taste. Rather than the liberation brought by the western powers, Soviet liberation ushered in the trappings of the Stalinist state. The cold war after 1945 made it difficult to integrate the Soviet contribution into the collective western memory of the war, while it also allowed the Soviet Union to write the contribution of its allies out of the script.

In reality they needed each other. Soviet efforts required the flow of resources under the "Lend Lease" programme. Weapons were few, and the Soviets regarded them as second-rate. But the supply of raw materials, food and communications equipment was essential. It allowed Soviet industry to concentrate on weapons to fight back with. Without Lend Lease the rail system and food supply might well have folded up as they had in the first world war.

The sour taste has become more marked with the fall of communism 15 years ago. The opening up of Soviet archives has shown a system that for some critics makes it almost indistinguishable from the totalitarian enemy it was fighting. This makes it more difficult to embrace the Soviet contribution to victory. The ordinary Soviet people were not only numberless victims of war, but they failed to achieve any political reform as a result of their triumph. Yet it is their exceptional sacrifice that we should remember as we look back over 60 years. And in the end the peoples of eastern Europe were unquestionably better off under the new communist regimes than under German imperial domination. German plans by the middle of the war foresaw the deliberate starvation of at least 35 million people in the east as "useless eaters", and the genocidal destruction of the Jewish and gypsy populations. The eastern peoples were described in German documents as the "helots" of the new empire. This grotesque imperial fantasy was won or lost on the eastern front, and who can regret its defeat?

The Soviet Union is not the only state to be written out of the victory story in the west. The Chinese people also lost an estimated 20 million as a result of Japanese aggression. Just as the Soviet armed forces held down the Germans, so the less effective but numerous Chinese armed forces kept the Japanese bogged down in Asia. This is a record that is still almost unknown in the west, yet if Japan had achieved quick victory in China, large resources would have been released for an assault on the rear of the Soviet Union, or a larger military presence in the Pacific. In this case, too, western allied casualties would have been much greater without the stubborn resistance of their Asian ally.

In the end, the western freedom to plan and execute a global strategy depended on the ability of the Soviet and Chinese forces to hold the main enemies at bay while western air forces bombed the Axis motherlands flat. When victory is celebrated tomorrow, it is important that we pause to remember the almost 50 million Soviets and Chinese who perished to contain the imperial aggression of Germany and Japan.

Nor should we forget, when condemning Soviet repression in eastern Europe that allied airforces bombed German and Japanese cities up to the very end of the war, inflicting the deaths of more than 600,000 civilians and opening the nuclear age. After 1945 Britain and France re-imposed undemocratic imperial rule in Africa and south-east Asia. None of the victors has anything to feel smug about. The pursuit of victory made all the allies do things they might never have imagined themselves doing.

One question that almost certainly will not be asked as the world indulges in what is probably the last great bout of victory nostalgia is why those states that viewed themselves as the bearers of progress and the modern age descended between 1914 and 1945 into a hideous orgy of war, civil conflict, repression and genocide. Mercifully, 1945 marked a real break with that 30-year crisis, but the nagging issues remain. If they could do it then, what are the restraints that prevent the developed world from once again plunging into the madness of mass war and state violence? Perhaps 1945 is a lesson learned, but those restraints need to be well understood. Next time the millions of dead may not be for our allies alone to bear.


世界反法西斯战争的中国战场 -- The world anti-facist war -- China battlefield:

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.