- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 184 Hour
- Reading permission
Fish, you are too hypocritical to be an honest broker for the truth
China defending its territorial sovergnity against Islamic separatist is justified. Is there another country in this world, if faced with the same circumstances as China, and also had the means to stop it, would choose to let these Islamic separatist run their country amuck? |
Let think about this fairly! If any countries were illegally occupied, wouldn’t they feel justified in defending it with whatever means they can? It laughable, Fish, that you can write with a straight face, amongst all your hypocrisy. The very terror we saw in London, is the same type of terror we see every day in Iraq, but only in a much larger scale. Where is the outrage on behalf of the innocent Iraqis that are being victimized by our government everyday for the last 2 plus years?
You are just too insular and biased to be an honest broker for the truth. Depending on one’s point of view, an act can be seen as terrorism or freedom fighting.
Think about how the US was formed. Washington and his gang decided to declare independence from the British monarchy (King George III). Since Washington’s gang was so overmatched, they used some tactics that some would call, terrorism, to deal with the vastly superior British military. It was such a losing battle that Franklin was summoned to France to ask for help, and it was with French help, that the British was defeated. From a British standpoint, Washington and his gang used some terror tactics against the Brits, but I am sure some American historians will remember these battles differently, and say Washington’s tactics were justified to win independence from the British. One can say both perspectives were right depending on what side you were favoring.
Some people may see the insurgents as terrorist, while others do see freedom fighters trying to defend their own country from illegal occupation, and using whatever tactics available to reach those goals. Then there are freedom fighters who travel to Iraq to enter the battlezone, for their own religious reasons, as well as their hatred towards the occupation of Iraq. Being able to see both sides require being an honest broker to the truth, and not just a blind hypocrite. Fish, your one-sided mindless diatribes, belies any credibility you may have for fundamental fairness. But I suspect that you don’t care about being fair in your opinions, since you write so hypocritically so often.