- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 0 Hour
- Reading permission
Reply: well, my takes
“But as you said, that's pre-modern society. We are no longer there. The issue has become a non-issue. So why not leave them be?”
Even thought the child morality rate is no longer an issue, the main problem if creating a replacement population would still exist if homo made up a significant part of the population.
Actually the problem would be even worse since some country are reproducing below replacement rate.
Cannot leave it at that because there is still the decease spreading and child molestation issue.
So are diabetics, so are cancer patients. All these are all genetic mutations. But we don't deny their right to choose and live. They are human, and they should be afforded human rights.
Diabetes and cancer and not speared through via sex.
Homosexuals basically choose to get AIDS. It is a 100% avoidable decease.
At any time AIDS could mutate into a form that could be spread easily through the normal population. It is best we put and end to homosexuality before that happens.
Just look at how china treated SAR patients.
“They account for 5-10% of the population, according to the latest studies. Provided that the rest of us vote inline with our own beliefs, I don't see how such a small number of people can override the majority. A non-issue really.”
Wrong, the latest studies put them between 2% and maybe up to 3% depending on the way the question is ask.
My point was, if the genetic mutation of homosexuality spread to 51% percent of the population, then they could out vote the normal population to legalize child molestation. This is just another reason it is a dangerous mutation.
My stance is that as long as someone or a group of people do not pose as a threat to the rest of us, they should be tolerated, and give the rights that all humans have.
I don’t believe the idea of “tolerance” should be here.
This is not a clear cut issue. For example, I do not have problem in general with homosexual woman because they do not spread decease and molest children. Therefore, I believe society could tolerate homosexual woman.
But if homosexual woman become a large part of the population, I would then have a problem with them.
If gay men did not molest children and spread decease at such a high rate, I would be more tolerant of them. Even though I would not accept there behave as normal.