- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 66 Hour
- Reading permission
YET MORE Lies|
The Boeing 737 MAX is a flying turd with the engines in the WRONG PLACE. It should never have been certified and if Boeing hadn't LIED to the FAA about MCAS being only 0.6° of trim rather than 2.5° of anti-stall, then it wouldn't have been. They also lied to airlines by NOT EVEN TELLING THEM MCAS was installed.
Despite Dennis Muilenburg having already accepted the blame and the pilots of both the Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines having been exonerated, they're still trying to claim that minor changes will make the flying turd with the engines in the WRONG PLACE safe to fly.
The 737 MAX flying turd is Boeing's biggest revenue stream and Boeing is the Great Satan's biggest exporter. That's why the Shyster of Omaha claimed he would fly in one of these flying turds despite the aviation experts across the planet having grounded them because, unlike the Shyster of Omaha, they know what they're talking about.
The first lie was that the data from the sensors was fault, implying, but not stating that the sensors had failed, when the sensors were NOT CAPABLE of distinguishing between a steep climb and a stall below a certain speed.
Then they lied that just a s**tware fix on MCAS would solve the problem. And they were, in fact, trying to change it before the Ethiopian crash. But the claimed adjustment was that it would only trigger once rather than fighting with the pilots. That would leave open the reason why they installed MCAS at all.
Then they lied that the pilots did not follow procedure. But we know the Lion Air pilots did. That procedure was without the knowledge that MCAS had been installed.
We know the Ethiopian pilots DID switch off MCAS, which was probably not official procedure because they only knew about MCAS because an off-duty pilot showed them how days earlier. Unfortunately the 737 has ALWAYS been a flying turd with an flaw in the design of the tail stabiliser that required the absurd "rollercoaster" manoeuvre. But with MCAS having triggered at only 450ft, they had no opportunity to use this daft manoeuvre. Instead, they had to try switching MCAS back on and it momentarily worked before the pile of krap started trying to put the flying turd back into a dive at only 450ft.
Now they're trying to lie that a sensor on the Lion Air flight was not fixed properly by raising questions but not providing any conclusive answers, which is a common propaganda technique that raises doubts about already proven facts; a technique known as "gaslighting" after the Ingrid Bergman movie: Weeks after a Lion Air jet crashed in the Java Sea, killing all 189 aboard, an airline employee gave investigators photographs meant to show that a crucial repair had been properly performed the day before the disaster.
- Pictures Raise Specter of Fake Evidence in 737 Max Crash Probe
Note they claim the repair was "crucial", but fail to claim that it caused the crash.
The time displayed in photos of a computer screen in the cockpit of the Boeing Co. 737 Max indicated they had actually been taken before the repair was performed, according to a draft of the final crash report being prepared by Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Committee, portions of which were reviewed by Bloomberg News.
So, if they did the repair and then photographed the time would the time be then "after" the repair and also invalid, or are they supposed to take a photo as they're actually doing the repair?
Investigators were similarly unable to confirm the authenticity of other pictures in the packet, which were supposed to show how a piece of equipment near the jet’s nose had been calibrated, according to the report.
Just as Saddam Hussein could not provide proof he had no WMD, you can't prove a negative. It doesn't mean that the photos were not authentic.
There were indications that the pictures depicted a different plane, according to two people familiar with the investigation.
But were those "indications" proof?
The draft report doesn’t say whether anyone falsified or misrepresented the pictures -- which would be considered a serious breach of protocol -- but concludes that they may not be valid evidence.
Again, it's not proof.
The sensor, known as an “angle-of-attack” vane, was malfunctioning on the very next flight as well as the one the next day that crashed and is at the heart of the investigation, according to an NTSC preliminary report released last November.
Really? Again, what proof? We already know they've been lying about the sensor data being flawed rather than the sensor themselves. Is it the "malfunctioning" that's in the preliminary report or the "heart of the investigation"?
Visible in the background of these photos was other equipment with identification marks, the people said. Officials at Boeing were able to trace at least one of the devices to a different 737 Max jet operated by Lion Air, they said.
That would be some proof that they had the wrong photos but assuming the now proven liars at Boeing aren't lying again, it still doesn't prove the repairs were not done on the flying turd that crashed or that they were not performed properly.
While investigators haven’t said whether they’ve recovered the angle-of-attack sensor from the bottom of the sea, the plane’s black-box flight recorder was brought up and confirmed the sensor was malfunctioning.
. . .
Investigators believe a malfunction of the sensor on board the Lion Air flight mistakenly forced the nose of the plane down repeatedly until the pilots lost control.
That's hard to believe as the propaganda article appears to offer both a confirmation and some doubt as to whether the sensor failed or not.
I would have preferred to see a quote from one of the investigators. Instead they're correctly saying nothing and telling everyone to wait for the report to be issued. The above propaganda article is jumping the gun, which, in of itself, is reason to believe they're lying. There is yet no conclusive evidence and as they admit the report will be released in November.
However, data in the report suggest the calibration wasn’t done properly or at all, said John Goglia, a former airline mechanic who formerly served on the NTSB.
. . .
“They were given an unairworthy airplane because the maintenance was incomplete and didn’t correct the problem,” he said.
Again, instead of this "suggestion" where's the substantiating and conclusive evidence from Goglia who can't even say whether it was even done, yet also claims it may have been done but not properly?
Great Satan criminality, corruption, cronyism, krappiness and greed can only be described as unrestrained and undisguised. Violations of laws, international or domestic happen on a daily basis. You can't trust the vermin who lied to produce this flying turd and are now lying to try and get it back in the air. Even the Boeing hirelings said they would never fly in them. It would be like trusting Mark Zuckerberg with your personal data.