Author: dragon8

"I Have Proof That A Missile Hit Pentagon On 9/11"   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-1-5 19:16:39 |Display all floors
petera Post time: 2017-1-1 09:54
No Planes

There were no planes. Towers 1 & 2 were nuked using 4 sub kiloton variable yield W54 wa ...


*It was a bomb. Bomb in the other building*

How many buildings do you believe contained bombs?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-1-5 19:24:07 |Display all floors
petera Post time: 2017-1-1 09:54
No Planes

There were no planes. Towers 1 & 2 were nuked using 4 sub kiloton variable yield W54 wa ...

*You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!*


Are you showing fake videos?

If so, why?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-1-5 19:31:51 |Display all floors
dragon8 Post time: 2017-1-5 19:07
*No second plane*

*No Planes*

None

The videos of "UA 175" were supposed to be proof that planes crashed into the towers. The problem is that the "plane" behaved in a fashion that is contrary to physical and engineering laws and principles. There are no independent witnesses to the event. One crucial piece of wreckage - the Murray St engine, was of the wrong type and has joined the fake videos in the Memory Hole. There is no evidence at all that "AA 11" flew into the North Tower. The Naudet Brothers' video is proof of nothing.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-1-5 19:33:05 |Display all floors
petera Post time: 2017-1-1 09:54
No Planes

There were no planes. Towers 1 & 2 were nuked using 4 sub kiloton variable yield W54 wa ...

*Towers 1 & 2 were nuked*


Why would the operation planners choose nukes?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-1-5 19:38:19 |Display all floors
dragon8 Post time: 2017-1-5 19:16
*It was a bomb. Bomb in the other building*

How many buildings do you believe contained bombs? ...

Four sets of Bombs

Each building had 2 sets of bombs. One set in each building consisted of conventional explosives and created the plane shaped cut outs. Ace Baker has explained when and how these explosives were placed. Each building also had 4 W54 variable yield fusion assisted fission mini nukes. These warheads were synchronized to detonate in a top down sequence and pulverized the 500,000 ton steel and concrete towers in seconds.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-1-5 19:43:24 |Display all floors
dragon8 Post time: 2017-1-5 19:24
*You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!*

Media

The media showed fake videos and a year or two later withdrew the videos globally.
I show gifs and excerpts whenever I can to demonstrate the obvious impossibilities they contain. I have also provided calculations that prove that the fuselage would have buckled on contact and that prove the wings would have been sheared off.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-1-5 19:48:46 |Display all floors
petera Post time: 2017-1-1 09:54
No Planes

There were no planes. Towers 1 & 2 were nuked using 4 sub kiloton variable yield W54 wa ...


*The Pentagon may have been hit by a missile but I am tending towards the safer alternative of explosives planted internally*


Why choose nukes for the twin towers, but non-nukes for the Pentagon?

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.