Views: 4257|Replies: 25

The Brexit rebuke [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2018 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member Medal of honor Medal of honor Medal of honor

Post time 2016-6-27 13:58:37 |Display all floors
This post was edited by dostoevskydr at 2016-6-27 13:59

By Stephen Kinzer
June 27, 2016


Astonishment, jubilation, and awe seized the hearts of European leaders after they took decisive steps toward uniting their continent in December 1991.


As a correspondent covering the Maastricht summit, I was caught up in the excitement. Within hours after I filed my report, though, my editor called from New York. He did not believe what I had written. How, he demanded, could countries with such vastly different histories and political cultures believe that they could function as one?


As I reassured him that this was really happening, I could hear his incredulity rising. I felt sorry for him. He had spent decades covering old Europe, with all its conflicts and rivalries. This, I concluded, had made him too narrow-minded to understand that a completely new Europe was emerging. Finally I persuaded him that what I had reported was real. His disgusted response, minus expletives, was: “That’s the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard.”


A quarter-century later, Europe is coming around to his view. Britain’s vote to quit the EU is in part an expression of self-defeating insularity, but it is also a stern rebuke to arrogant elites. The project that began at Maastricht was unrealistic. It might have succeeded, but was dragged down by the failure of its leaders to listen to ordinary citizens.


European unity remains a splendid idea. It is in trouble for two reasons. First, it places utopian dreams of cooperation above the reality of nationalism. People want to be governed by leaders from their own “imagined community,” not by outsiders. They want at least the illusion that they control their own fate. The EU has pretended this deep need does not exist, or that it can be wiped away with glittering phrases and promises. Ignoring the deep cultural roots of nationalism has not made it disappear. On the contrary, by attacking the principle of sovereignty so directly, the EU inadvertently fed the nationalist backlash that is now sweeping Europe.


The second reason the Maastricht project collapsed is the EU itself. It is run by a corps of unelected bureaucrats, many of them unconnected to traditional society and contemptuous of public opinion. Visionaries who promoted European unity in the years after World War II saw it as a gift to the continent’s people. But their successors have rarely consulted those people, listened to their complaints, or adjusted EU policies to meet their needs. Instead, they embraced the ideology of deregulation, privatization, and reduced social spending. They imagined Europe as a free-trade zone with open borders but little social protection for ordinary people. That is hardly a vision to stir people’s hearts.


Europeans are angry at the EU not only because they feel it is disrupting their lives with sweeping dictates on everything from the size of bananas to immigration. Their deeper resentment is over the way these decisions are made. They come from a remote body called the European Commission, whose members are chosen by back-room bargaining, and from its president, a bland politician from Luxembourg named Jean-Claude Juncker, who is also unelected and would go unrecognized on almost any street in Europe. This has led to frustration, then to anger, and finally to rebellion in Britain.


Reason tells us that whatever the EU’s flaws, abandoning it in favor of a return to atavistic nationalism could lead to disaster. Voters, however, are not always guided by reason. They need emotional as well as political reassurance. The EU has not listened to its constituents. Like other self-absorbed ruling classes, including those in the United States, it is now paying for its arrogance.


Maastricht is dead. That is not all bad. The EU will soon be rid of a member state that was constantly denouncing it and continually asking for special treatment – a form of blackmail that is unhealthy for any organization. Now it has a chance to change course. If the EU becomes a project based on improving human lives rather than raising corporate profits, European unity may still have a future.


This article has been excerpted from: ‘Brexit–A Stern Rebuke to Arrogant Elites’.


Courtesy: Commondreams.org

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2016-6-27 17:07:30 |Display all floors
This post was edited by emanreus at 2016-6-28 12:37

As I mentioned beforehand,
The 6 core leaders of the EU should forgive the BREXIT one more time..

UNDER one condition  this is:

They MUST join the EURO club or it's good bye for good.
The discussion must be forwarded to the EU club in Brussels within the 9th months of this year.

Only one word:

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2016-6-29 17:26:32 |Display all floors
emanreus Post time: 2016-6-27 17:07
As I mentioned beforehand,
The 6 core leaders of the EU should forgive the BREXIT one more time..

Two words- NO THANKS!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2016-6-29 18:03:37 |Display all floors
Laowai2? Post time: 2016-6-29 17:26
Two words- NO THANKS!

If UK sought to join the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), remain in the European Economic Area (EEA) and therefore continue to have access to the single market, or preferred to go it alone and negotiate bilateral agreements with the EU along the lines of the Swiss model.

The Norwegian model they might go for, but the membership fee towards the Eu will be higher as they dish out now.
Only nobody tell the folks of the demoncracy  

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2016-6-29 18:12:51 |Display all floors
Great choice England

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2016-6-29 22:03:12 |Display all floors
dusty1 Post time: 2016-6-29 18:12
Great choice England

The Norwegian model!!

Norway and EEA partners Iceland and Liechtenstein contributes to the budget of the EU..
For the period 2014 – 2020, Norway’s average annual commitment is 447 million euro.

There's a saying, we pay but have no say.

Welcome UK.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2016-6-30 04:07:40 |Display all floors
emanreus Post time: 2016-6-29 22:03
The Norwegian model!!

Norway and EEA partners Iceland and Liechtenstein contributes to the budget ...

We get our commonwealth rights back

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.